Normalization of Linear Superposition of ψ States

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the normalization of a wave function for an electron in an infinitely deep potential well, specifically in a linear superposition of the first and third quantum states. The original poster is trying to determine the frequency of oscillation of the electron probability density while grappling with the normalization of the wave function.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to normalize the wave function by integrating the square of the total wave function. They express confusion regarding the constants involved in the normalization process and question how to proceed without specific values for these constants.
  • Some participants suggest that the values of the coefficients A and B are not necessary for determining the frequency of oscillation, emphasizing that the time dependence of the stationary states is crucial for calculating the probability distribution.
  • Others question the implications of the relative magnitudes of A and B on the frequency of the probability density, expressing a desire to understand the normalization process better.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants exploring the implications of the normalization constants and the time dependence of the wave function. There is recognition that while the magnitudes of A and B cannot be determined from the given information, the relationship between the energy levels and the frequency of oscillation remains a focal point.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem does not provide specific values for the coefficients A and B, which complicates the normalization process. The original poster expresses uncertainty about whether additional information is needed to normalize the wave function effectively.

The Head
Messages
137
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


An electron in an infinitely deep potential well of thickness 4 angstroms is placed in a linear superposition of the first and third states. What is the frequency of oscillation of the electron probability density?

Homework Equations


E=hω

The Attempt at a Solution


My main problem right now is with the normalization of the wave function:

I have ψTotal=Aψ1+ Bψ3
∫|ψT|^2=1=∫(|A|^2*sin^2(pi*z/Lz) +|B|^2*sin^2(3pi*z/Lz))dz (the other terms with A*B and B*A become zero after integration)
=(Lz(|A|^2+|B|^2))/2=1

So
|A|^2+|B|^2=2/Lz

What I'd like to do next is calculate the probability density of the electrons, but I end up with |A|^2, |B|^2, A*B, & B*A terms and don't know how to get actual numbers for all these constants, or otherwise to properly normalize this. I know what to do if the superposition of states was equally split, but it does not say that here.

Any thoughts on what I'm doing wrong? Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You don't need to worry about the values of A and B to answer the question. The frequency of oscillation of the probability distribution does not depend on A or B. So, you can leave A and B unspecified. Since you are interested in the time dependence of the probability distribution, you will need to include the time dependence of each of the two stationary states when you calculate ##|\Psi_{total}(t)|^2##.
 
So would the only thing that really matters be the exp(+/-(E3-E1)it/h), where ω=(E3-E1)/h? It just seems strange to me that whether one eigenstate dominates or not does not affect the frequency of electron probability density.

Also, I have difficulty in general with normalization. If I needed to normalize this sort of function, would that be possible with the information given, or would I need something else?

Thank you & I appreciate your help.
 
The Head said:
So would the only thing that really matters be the exp(+/-(E3-E1)it/h), where ω=(E3-E1)/h? It just seems strange to me that whether one eigenstate dominates or not does not affect the frequency of electron probability density.

Yes, ω=(E3-E1)/[itex]\hbar[/itex].

When you write out ##|\Psi_{total}(t)|^2##, you should be able to see the effect of changing the relative sizes of A and B. In particular, you should think about the case where A = B and the case where A >> B or A << B.

Also, I have difficulty in general with normalization. If I needed to normalize this sort of function, would that be possible with the information given, or would I need something else?

From the information given in the problem, you cannot determine the magnitudes of A and B. As you showed, all you can determine is the value of |A|2 + |B|2.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
5K