Normalization to delta distribution

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 2K views
Jano L.
Gold Member
Messages
1,330
Reaction score
75
Do you know some example of an operator, other than momentum or position, that has (at least partially) continuous spectrum with eigenvalues [itex]s[/itex], and the corresponding eigenfunctions obey

[tex] (\Phi_s,\Phi_s') = \int \Phi_s^*(q) \, \Phi_{s'} (q)~ dq = \delta(s-s')~?[/tex]

EDIT
For example, Hamiltonian of a free particle does not work with this, because the integral

[tex] \int \Phi_\epsilon^*(q) \, \Phi_{\epsilon'} (q)~ dq [/tex]

with [itex]\Phi_\epsilon(q) = e^{i \sqrt{2m\epsilon} \,q/\hbar}[/itex] does not equal to [itex]\delta(\epsilon - \epsilon')[/itex].
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why not. Let's set
[tex]\Phi_{\epsilon}(q)=N(\epsilon) \exp(\mathrm{i} \sqrt{2m \epsilon} q).[/tex]
This is indeed the generalized eigenfunction of the free Hamiltonian
[tex]\hat{H}=-\frac{1}{2m} \frac{\mathrm{d}^2}{\mathrm{d} q^2}[/tex]
in position-space representation.

Now we have
[tex]\langle \epsilon'|\epsilon \rangle = \int_{\mathbb{R}} \mathrm{d} q \Phi_{\epsilon'}^*(q) \Phi_{\epsilon}(q) = 2 \pi |N(\epsilon)|^2 \delta \left [\sqrt{2m}(\sqrt{\epsilon}-\sqrt{\epsilon'} \right]=\sqrt{8m \epsilon} \pi |N(\epsilon)|^2 \delta(\epsilon-\epsilon').[/tex]
Thus setting
[tex]N(\epsilon)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\sqrt{8m \epsilon} \pi}}[/tex]
normalizes your functions to a [itex]\delta[/itex] distribution.

Of course, this is not a complete set, because also
[tex]\Psi_{\epsilon}(q)=N(\epsilon) \exp(-\mathrm{i} \sqrt{2m \epsilon} q)[/tex]
are eigenfunctions of the Hamiltonian with the same eigenvalue [itex]\epsilon[/itex].

Each energy eigenvalue is thus twofold degenerate. You can classify the energy eigenstates further by parity. That also explains the degeneracy: the parity operation commutes with the Hamiltonian and thus can be simultaneously diagonalized. The energy-parity eigenstates are given by
[tex]u_{\epsilon,P}(q)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} [\Phi_{\epsilon}(q) + P \Psi_{\epsilon}(q)] \quad \text{with} \quad P \in \{-1,+1\}.[/tex]

The energy is degenerate, and the generalized basis built by[itex]\Phi_{\epsilon}[/itex] and [itex]\Psi_{\epsilon}[/itex] or [itex]u_{\epsilon,P}[/itex] is pretty inconvenient to work with. Much more convenient is the basis of momentum eigenfunctions,
[tex]v_{p}(q)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi}} \exp(-\mathrm{i} p q), \quad p \in \mathbb{R}[/tex]
and has all nice properties of the above constructed energy-parity eigenbasis, because of course the [itex]v_{p}[/itex] are also generalized energy eigenstates.
 
Thank you very much! It is much more clear now. I didn't realize one can normalize [itex]\Phi_\epsilon[/itex]'s by dividing by [itex]\sqrt{\epsilon}[/itex].
 
Oh this somehow got to the classical physics forum, I apologize for that.