Normalization to delta distribution

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the normalization of eigenfunctions associated with operators that have a continuous spectrum, specifically exploring the conditions under which these eigenfunctions can be normalized to a delta distribution. The focus is on the Hamiltonian of a free particle and the implications of its eigenfunctions.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about examples of operators with continuous spectra and the normalization of their eigenfunctions to a delta distribution.
  • Another participant proposes a specific form for the eigenfunctions of the free Hamiltonian and derives the normalization condition, suggesting that the eigenfunctions can be normalized to a delta distribution with an appropriate choice of normalization factor.
  • This second participant notes that the energy eigenvalues are twofold degenerate and discusses the classification of energy eigenstates by parity, indicating that the parity operation commutes with the Hamiltonian.
  • A later reply expresses gratitude for the clarification regarding the normalization of the eigenfunctions, indicating a realization about the normalization process.
  • One participant acknowledges a potential misplacement of the discussion in the forum context.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the normalization of eigenfunctions, as the discussion includes various approaches and interpretations regarding the eigenstates and their properties.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved aspects regarding the completeness of the eigenfunction set and the implications of degeneracy in the energy eigenvalues.

Jano L.
Gold Member
Messages
1,330
Reaction score
75
Do you know some example of an operator, other than momentum or position, that has (at least partially) continuous spectrum with eigenvalues [itex]s[/itex], and the corresponding eigenfunctions obey

[tex] (\Phi_s,\Phi_s') = \int \Phi_s^*(q) \, \Phi_{s'} (q)~ dq = \delta(s-s')~?[/tex]

EDIT
For example, Hamiltonian of a free particle does not work with this, because the integral

[tex] \int \Phi_\epsilon^*(q) \, \Phi_{\epsilon'} (q)~ dq [/tex]

with [itex]\Phi_\epsilon(q) = e^{i \sqrt{2m\epsilon} \,q/\hbar}[/itex] does not equal to [itex]\delta(\epsilon - \epsilon')[/itex].
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why not. Let's set
[tex]\Phi_{\epsilon}(q)=N(\epsilon) \exp(\mathrm{i} \sqrt{2m \epsilon} q).[/tex]
This is indeed the generalized eigenfunction of the free Hamiltonian
[tex]\hat{H}=-\frac{1}{2m} \frac{\mathrm{d}^2}{\mathrm{d} q^2}[/tex]
in position-space representation.

Now we have
[tex]\langle \epsilon'|\epsilon \rangle = \int_{\mathbb{R}} \mathrm{d} q \Phi_{\epsilon'}^*(q) \Phi_{\epsilon}(q) = 2 \pi |N(\epsilon)|^2 \delta \left [\sqrt{2m}(\sqrt{\epsilon}-\sqrt{\epsilon'} \right]=\sqrt{8m \epsilon} \pi |N(\epsilon)|^2 \delta(\epsilon-\epsilon').[/tex]
Thus setting
[tex]N(\epsilon)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\sqrt{8m \epsilon} \pi}}[/tex]
normalizes your functions to a [itex]\delta[/itex] distribution.

Of course, this is not a complete set, because also
[tex]\Psi_{\epsilon}(q)=N(\epsilon) \exp(-\mathrm{i} \sqrt{2m \epsilon} q)[/tex]
are eigenfunctions of the Hamiltonian with the same eigenvalue [itex]\epsilon[/itex].

Each energy eigenvalue is thus twofold degenerate. You can classify the energy eigenstates further by parity. That also explains the degeneracy: the parity operation commutes with the Hamiltonian and thus can be simultaneously diagonalized. The energy-parity eigenstates are given by
[tex]u_{\epsilon,P}(q)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} [\Phi_{\epsilon}(q) + P \Psi_{\epsilon}(q)] \quad \text{with} \quad P \in \{-1,+1\}.[/tex]

The energy is degenerate, and the generalized basis built by[itex]\Phi_{\epsilon}[/itex] and [itex]\Psi_{\epsilon}[/itex] or [itex]u_{\epsilon,P}[/itex] is pretty inconvenient to work with. Much more convenient is the basis of momentum eigenfunctions,
[tex]v_{p}(q)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi}} \exp(-\mathrm{i} p q), \quad p \in \mathbb{R}[/tex]
and has all nice properties of the above constructed energy-parity eigenbasis, because of course the [itex]v_{p}[/itex] are also generalized energy eigenstates.
 
Thank you very much! It is much more clear now. I didn't realize one can normalize [itex]\Phi_\epsilon[/itex]'s by dividing by [itex]\sqrt{\epsilon}[/itex].
 
Oh this somehow got to the classical physics forum, I apologize for that.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K