Normed space and its double dual

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter dmuthuk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dual Space
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the relationship between the dual space Y* of a subspace Y and the dual space X* of a normed space X over ℝ. It establishes that Y* is isomorphic to the quotient space X*/K, where K is the kernel of the canonical map from X* to Y*. The Hahn-Banach theorem is utilized to show that any element of Y* can be extended to a continuous linear map in X*. Additionally, it is noted that if X is a Hilbert space, then X* is also a Hilbert space and can be decomposed into K and its orthogonal complement K', which is isomorphic to Y*.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of normed spaces and their properties
  • Familiarity with dual spaces and the concept of linear maps
  • Knowledge of the Hahn-Banach theorem
  • Basic concepts of Hilbert spaces and their characteristics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Hahn-Banach theorem in detail to understand its implications in functional analysis
  • Explore the concept of quotient spaces in the context of linear algebra
  • Learn about the properties of dual spaces in various types of normed spaces
  • Investigate the relationship between Hilbert spaces and their duals, focusing on isomorphisms
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, functional analysts, and students studying advanced linear algebra or functional analysis, particularly those interested in the properties of normed spaces and duality.

dmuthuk
Messages
41
Reaction score
1
Hi, I am trying to sort out a few things about the dual and double dual of a normed space which has got me a little confused.

Given a normed space [tex]X[/tex] over [tex]\mathbb{R}[/tex], if [tex]Y[/tex] is a subspace of [tex]X[/tex], what is the relationship between [tex]Y^*[/tex] and [tex]X^*[/tex]? Can [tex]Y^*[/tex] be identified with some subspace of [tex]X^*[/tex]?

Also, we have the natural embedding of [tex]X[/tex] into [tex]X^{**}[/tex] given by the map [tex]x\mapsto\hat{x}[/tex] where [tex]\hat{x}:X^*\to\mathbb{R}[/tex] is evaluation at [tex]x[/tex]. How do we use this to define the natural embedding of [tex]Y[/tex] into [tex]Y^{**}[/tex]? Here is my idea: We want to send [tex]y[/tex] to [tex]\hat{y}_Y:Y^*\to\mathbb{R}[/tex]. So, we define [tex]\hat{y}_Y[/tex] as follows. For [tex]y^*\in Y^*[/tex], choose an arbitrary extension [tex]x^*\in X^*[/tex] (we can use Hahn-Banach here). Then, we say [tex]\hat{y}_Y(y^*):=\hat{y}(x^*)[/tex]. Does this depend on the choice of extension [tex]x^*[/tex]?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dmuthuk said:
Given a normed space [tex]X[/tex] over [tex]\mathbb{R}[/tex], if [tex]Y[/tex] is a subspace of [tex]X[/tex], what is the relationship between [tex]Y^*[/tex] and [tex]X^*[/tex]? Can [tex]Y^*[/tex] be identified with some subspace of [tex]X^*[/tex]?
Elements of X* are linear maps X->R, so can also be considered as elements of Y* by restriction to Y.
This gives a canonical map X*->Y*.

The kernel of the map, say K, consists of those elements of X* which map all of Y to 0. Also, the Hahn-Banach theorem says that any element of Y* can be extended to a continuous linear map X->R. So, X*->Y* is onto.

These facts are enough to conclude that Y* is isomorphic to X*/K. i.e. a quotient, not a subspace, of X*.

If X is a Hilbert space, then X* will also be a Hilbert space (isomorphic to X), in which case X* can be decomposed as the sum of K and its orthogonal complement K', which will be isomorphic to Y*. Don't think that X* can be decomposed like this in general though.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
4K
Replies
0
Views
667
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K