MHB Northcott - Sums and Products of Ideals

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sums
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on D.G. Northcott's book "Lessons on Rings and Modules and Multiplicities," specifically Chapter 2, which addresses prime ideals and primary submodules. The key result discussed is the inclusion of the sum of products of ideals, expressed as $$\sum_{i,j} A_i B_j \subseteq (A_1 + A_2 + \ ... \ + A_m)(B_1 + B_2 + \ ... \ + B_n)$$. The reasoning provided confirms that the product of two ideals is closed under addition, establishing that both $$A_1 + \cdots + A_m$$ and $$B_1 + \cdots + B_n$$ are indeed ideals, thereby supporting the inclusion statement.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of ring theory and ideal properties
  • Familiarity with D.G. Northcott's "Lessons on Rings and Modules and Multiplicities"
  • Knowledge of prime ideals and primary submodules
  • Basic grasp of algebraic structures and operations on ideals
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of ideal products in ring theory
  • Explore the concept of closure under addition for ideals
  • Review examples of prime ideals and their applications
  • Investigate the implications of sums and products of ideals in module theory
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, algebraists, and students studying ring theory, particularly those focusing on ideals and their properties in the context of modules and algebraic structures.

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading D.G. Northcott's book: Lessons on Rings and Modules and Multiplicities.

I am currently studying Chapter 2: Prime Ideals and Primary Submodules.

I need help with a result that Northcott quotes and proves on page 80 regarding sums and products of ideals.

The relevant text from Northcott reads as follows:

View attachment 3729

In the above text we read:

" ... ... Accordingly

$$ A_i B_j \subseteq (A_1 + A_2 + \ ... \ + A_m ) ( B_1 + B_2 + \ ... \ + B_n ) $$

and therefore

$$ \sum_{i,j} A_i B_j \subseteq (A_1 + A_2 + \ ... \ + A_m ) ( B_1 + B_2 + \ ... \ + B_n ) $$ ... ... "Can someone explain (formally and rigorously) exactly why it follows that:

$$\sum_{i,j} A_i B_j \subseteq (A_1 + A_2 + \ ... \ + A_m ) ( B_1 + B_2 + \ ... \ + B_n )$$ ... ... ?Hope someone can help ...

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Peter,

The reason why it follows that $\sum_{i,j} A_iB_j \subseteq (A_1 + \cdots + A_m)(B_1 + \cdots + B_n)$ is that $(A_1 + \cdots + A_m)(B_1 + \cdots B_n)$ is closed under addition. Remember, the product of two ideals of a ring is an ideal, so in particular, it is closed under addition. Also note that (finite) sum of ideals of a ring is an ideal -- that's why $A_1 + \cdots + A_m$ and $B_1 + \cdots + B_m$ are ideals of $R$.
 
Euge said:
Hi Peter,

The reason why it follows that $\sum_{i,j} A_iB_j \subseteq (A_1 + \cdots + A_m)(B_1 + \cdots + B_n)$ is that $(A_1 + \cdots + A_m)(B_1 + \cdots B_n)$ is closed under addition. Remember, the product of two ideals of a ring is an ideal, so in particular, it is closed under addition. Also note that (finite) sum of ideals of a ring is an ideal -- that's why $A_1 + \cdots + A_m$ and $B_1 + \cdots + B_m$ are ideals of $R$.
Thanks Euge,

Yes, follow that ... most clear and helpful ...

Thanks again,

Peter
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K