NOT A HWK QUESTION Molecular Theory PLEASE.

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ethan5
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Molecular Theory
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the interpretation of an experiment attributed to Francis Bacon regarding the compressibility of water and its interaction with metal spheres. Participants explore the historical context and implications of Bacon's findings, as well as the physical principles involved.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Historical
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the accuracy of a quotation regarding Bacon's experiment, suggesting it misrepresents his findings about water and metal.
  • Another participant provides a direct quote from Bacon's Novum Organum, emphasizing that Bacon demonstrated the compressibility of water rather than its diffusion through metal.
  • Some participants humorously speculate on the implications of water diffusing through metals, referencing submarines and materials like Gortex and glass.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally disagree on the interpretation of Bacon's experiment, with some asserting that the original claim about diffusion is incorrect, while others engage in light-hearted speculation without resolving the core disagreement.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the historical misunderstanding of Bacon's work and the physical principles of water's compressibility versus diffusion, but does not resolve the interpretations presented.

ethan5
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
NOT A HWK QUESTION! Molecular Theory PLEASE.

Hi, Does anyone know the veracity of the quotation of experiments by Francis Bacon, in some books published around the turn of 20C., stating that he filled metal spheres with water and, upon applying sufficient pressure, saw water droplets on the outside of the spheres indicating that the water molecules came through between the metal particles - so there are spaces between the metal atoms. It's interesting to read book like 'Heat considered as a mode of motion' as recommended by Clerk Maxwell or Millikan. Thanks for your time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


That's not what Bacon wrote. Quoting the Novum Organum:
Now it is certain that the rarer bodies (such as air) allow a considerable degree of contraction, as has been stated, but that tangible bodies (such as water) suffer compression with much greater difficulty and to a lesser extent. How far they do suffer it I have investigated in the following experiment. I had a hollow globe of lead made, capable of holding about two pints, and sufficiently thick to bear considerable force. Having made a hole in it, I filled it with water and then stopped up the hole with melted lead, so that the globe became quite solid. I then flattened two opposite sides of the globe with a heavy hammer, by which the water was necessarily contracted into less space, a sphere being the figure of largest capacity. And when the hammering had no more effect in making the water shrink, I made use of a mill or press, till the water, impatient of further pressure, exuded through the solid lead like a fine dew. I then computed the space lost by the compression and concluded that this was the extent of compression which the water had suffered, but only when constrained by great violence.

He didn't see the water diffuse through the metal, he saw the water spray out of a fissure. Water doesn't diffuse through metal. (Nor did he know anything about atoms, which came centuries later)

What he did do, was an excellent demonstration of the compressibility of water, which is what he intended to study.
 


If water could diffuse through metals, it would be a sad, sad story for submarines.
 


alxm said:
That's not what Bacon wrote. Quoting the Novum Organum:


He didn't see the water diffuse through the metal, he saw the water spray out of a fissure. Water doesn't diffuse through metal. (Nor did he know anything about atoms, which came centuries later)

What he did do, was an excellent demonstration of the compressibility of water, which is what he intended to study.

Thank you for your excellent reply. I've got to be careful!
 


Mentallic said:
If water could diffuse through metals, it would be a sad, sad story for submarines.

No Gortex Submarines in the future then? LOL
 


sophiecentaur said:
No Gortex Submarines in the future then? LOL

I guess we could even use glass then, for the viewing pleasure :wink:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
12K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
11K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K