Music Not quite physics -- why music sounds musical

  • Thread starter Thread starter houlahound
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Music Physics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the nature of music and its perception across different cultures and individuals. There is a general consensus that what qualifies as music versus mere sound is subjective, with no clear definition universally accepted. Western music, typically structured in 4/4 time, is familiar to many, making it easier for individuals to keep time with it, while traditional music from cultures like China or India may feel less accessible due to different rhythmic structures. The conversation touches on the influence of early exposure to music on personal taste and preferences, suggesting that cultural differences in musical appreciation may develop during formative years. The physics of music, including the mathematical relationships of frequencies and harmonics, is highlighted as a fundamental aspect that contributes to the perception of music. Additionally, the evolving nature of music allows for the incorporation of diverse sounds, including those traditionally considered noise, into musical compositions, reflecting the creativity of artists and the changing definitions of music over time.
houlahound
Messages
907
Reaction score
223
please delete if not physicsy enough for the PF.

I have always wondered why music sounds musical. there is general agreement through the music charts that a wide range people all agree on what a good song is evidently.

generalising above that, nearly everyone agrees regardless of the song/genre/personal taste what qualifies as music and what is just sounds, is there ANY science on this?

more generally being born in the west I like most everyone that does not even play an instrument can keep time with about every song in our typically 4/4 (regardless of speed/tempo) structure we have been cultured into, evidence by head-banging or foot tapping etc

listening to eg traditional Chinese or Indian music I can not keep time or figure any of it out to make it sound "musical".

my search terms did not pick up anything relevant to my query.

thoughts?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Music Theory. It's a subject. Math. Art. Read and learn about the mathematics behind music. It's an interesting topic.
 
  • Like
Likes houlahound
houlahound said:
nearly everyone agrees regardless of the song/genre/personal taste what qualifies as music and what is just sounds
I wouldn't be too sure about that. It's highly subjective. There's no clear consensus about when sounds become music. It doesn't even have a solid definition. What one person perceives as music and melodious might be noise to someone else (think how the ancient civilisations would react to thrash metal). :oldeek:
That being said, there might be some science to it.
 
If you have listened to sepultra's roots album you would know the ancients were into thrash.

Sepultura - Roots Bloody Roots [OFFICIAL VIDEO]:
 
Last edited:
houlahound said:
If you have listened to sepultra's roots album you would know the ancients were into thrash.
All of them??
 
houlahound said:
I have always wondered why music sounds musical
and why does a man recognize some things as beautiful? What is the esthetical feeling inside us? Why are the mathematical theorems beautiful? Why are views of nature beautiful?
Megaquark said:
Music Theory. It's a subject. Math. Art. Read and learn about the mathematics behind music. It's an interesting topic.
sure but white noise is also a mathematical subject
 
Clearly no expert - but IMO the cultural differences / preferances are likely developed during the formative years in the brain, as exposure to "normal" sounds occurred though the early years. Perhaps - look into some of the studies on feral children that had little to no exposure to music - if this was even checked in these few cases I have no idea.

There have been some interesting studied done with surgeons ( as to why they experiment whit surgeons IDK) - but their peromance ( quality of work) improves when music is played in the operating room, if I recall, even if it is music they do not necessarily like...
 
  • Like
Likes shadowshed and beamie564
Windadct said:
Clearly no expert - but IMO the cultural differences / preferances are likely developed during the formative years in the brain, as exposure to "normal" sounds occurred though the early years.

But take my case. My parents played or listened to polka's maybe Frank Sinatra and his contemporaries. My only exposure to other music until the mid fifties was in church. My father played the accordion and banjo. My parents could not figure out why I liked classical music as a teenager. I play no instruments.

It is said that there is no accounting for taste.
 
Western music is much more similar than you realize - all based on the same 12 notes / Octave in different scales - typically using a subset of these. When you look at truly different music African, Asian they may have a 5 / Octave division - and will sound completely different - to a true musician this strangeness may actually be very intriguing ( like a painter finding a new color- a color that the average person may not "like" due to being unfamiliar) .

In terms of physics or Elec. Engineering - I would speculate that much of this octave scaling came from the first instruments created and the harmonics they produce - these harmonics then produce various dissonance (unstable / typically little harmonic matching) to Consonance (stable, a lot of harmonics matching) when matching one not to another.
 
  • #10
Western music is based on simple ratios of frequencies (as found for example in the harmonic series of a natural trumpet) sounding good combined with the fact that most of those simple ratios are very close to powers of the 12th root of 2. The western chromatic scale is made possible by the fact that 219 is very close to 312.
 
  • Like
Likes jim hardy
  • #11
Do not ignore the attractiveness of Rhythm.
 
  • #12
Like any other cultural field that evolves over time, music is in a constant process of self-actualization.

In ancient times, 'noise' wouldn't be considered a musical element like it is today in many genres. Pretty much any sound, no matter how 'cacophonic' it is can be employ in a musical object. Typical Western structural elements like rhythm, harmony, melody, scales, tempo, etc, can be hijacked and subverted into something else entirely new. Heuristics are getting increasingly meta.

All up to the artists' creative minds since there are no stone-written rules about what or how music (or art for that matter) should be like.
 
  • #13
symbolipoint said:
Do not ignore the attractiveness of Rhythm.

who could forget this scene ?

 
  • #14
jim hardy said:
who could forget this scene ?


One could say they invented the Jam session.
[PLAIN said:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jam_session]A[/PLAIN] jam session is a musical event, process, or activity where musicians play (i.e. "jam") by improvising without extensive preparation ...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes jim hardy
  • #15
wrobel said:
and why does a man recognize some things as beautiful? What is the esthetical feeling inside us? Why are the mathematical theorems beautiful? Why are views of nature beautiful?

sure but white noise is also a mathematical subject

Why do we call it "white noise"? Noise has no color.
 
  • Like
Likes Pepper Mint
  • #16
Jupiter60 said:
Why do we call it "white noise"? Noise has no color.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_noise
It's an analogy with light; it means constant power across all frequencies of the audio spectrum, which for the light spectrum would give white light.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Back
Top