Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Notation for special summations

  1. Aug 5, 2008 #1
    Is there special notation for a function like this:



    If so, what would g(x_n) be?
  2. jcsd
  3. Aug 5, 2008 #2
    I forgot to add, a function like this:


    (the limit of each sum is another sum; fallowing the pattern in the above post of course)
  4. Aug 5, 2008 #3

    Ben Niehoff

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    For a small, finite number of indexes, sometimes I see the shorthand

    [tex]\sum_{i,j,k} f(x)[/tex]

    This usually occurs when all of the indexes run from 0 to the same limit N.

    If you have a variable number of indexes, then you can "index the indexes" as follows:

    [tex]S_n = \sum_{i_1 \dots i_n} f(x)[/tex]

    Oh, wait, I see you want each index to run up to the previous index. For a small number of indexes, you can do

    [tex]S_3 = \sum^N_{i > j > k} a_{ijk}(x)[/tex]

    And in general, you could probably write

    [tex]S_n = \sum^N_{i_1 > \dots > i_n} a_{i_1 \dots i_n}(x)[/tex]
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?

Similar Discussions: Notation for special summations
  1. Summation notation (Replies: 3)

  2. Summation Notation. (Replies: 3)

  3. Summation notation (Replies: 2)

  4. Summation notation (Replies: 2)