Notation for special summations

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter epkid08
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Notation
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the notation for special summations, specifically how to represent functions involving multiple summation indices. The participants propose various notations, including g(x_n) as a function of nested summations and the shorthand \sum_{i,j,k} f(x) for finite index ranges. They also introduce the concept of "indexing the indexes," represented as S_n = \sum_{i_1 \dots i_n} f(x), to handle variable numbers of indices. Additionally, they suggest using S_n = \sum^N_{i_1 > \dots > i_n} a_{i_1 \dots i_n}(x) for cases where each index runs up to the previous index.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of summation notation in mathematics
  • Familiarity with functions and their representations
  • Knowledge of indexing techniques in mathematical expressions
  • Basic grasp of finite and infinite series
NEXT STEPS
  • Research advanced summation techniques in mathematical literature
  • Explore the implications of nested summations in calculus
  • Learn about combinatorial notation and its applications
  • Study the use of indexed variables in programming languages
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, computer scientists, and students studying advanced calculus or combinatorics who are interested in the notation and representation of complex summations.

epkid08
Messages
264
Reaction score
1
Is there special notation for a function like this:
[tex]g(x_1)=\sum^k_jf(x)[/tex]

[tex]g(x_2)=\sum^p_k\sum^k_jf(x)[/tex]

[tex]g(x_3)=\sum^s_p\sum^p_k\sum^k_jf(x)[/tex]

If so, what would g(x_n) be?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I forgot to add, a function like this:

[tex]f(x_n)=\sum^{\sum^{\sum^{\sum^{\sum}}}}...[/tex]

(the limit of each sum is another sum; fallowing the pattern in the above post of course)
 
For a small, finite number of indexes, sometimes I see the shorthand

[tex]\sum_{i,j,k} f(x)[/tex]

This usually occurs when all of the indexes run from 0 to the same limit N.

If you have a variable number of indexes, then you can "index the indexes" as follows:

[tex]S_n = \sum_{i_1 \dots i_n} f(x)[/tex]

Oh, wait, I see you want each index to run up to the previous index. For a small number of indexes, you can do

[tex]S_3 = \sum^N_{i > j > k} a_{ijk}(x)[/tex]

And in general, you could probably write

[tex]S_n = \sum^N_{i_1 > \dots > i_n} a_{i_1 \dots i_n}(x)[/tex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K