Notation for the range of a set

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
7 replies · 14K views
bomba923
Messages
759
Reaction score
0
*Suppose I want to find the range of the set [tex]\left\{ {t_1 ,t_2 , \ldots ,t_n } \right\}[/tex], that is, the difference between the maximum and minimum values (of the elements that is!) in the set.

Do I have to fully write out,
[tex]\max \left\{ {t_1 ,t_2 , \ldots ,t_n } \right\} - \min \left\{ {t_1 ,t_2 , \ldots ,t_n } \right\}[/tex]

Or is there some nice shorthand/other notation to use ?
Maybe something like
[tex]\left\{ {t_1 ,t_2 , \ldots ,t_n } \right\}|_{\min }^{\max }[/tex] ??

*Is there any symbol/notation/shorthand available to represent a set's range?
(b/c writing out [itex]\max \left\{ {t_1 ,t_2 , \ldots ,t_n } \right\} - \min \left\{ {t_1 ,t_2 , \ldots ,t_n } \right\}[/itex] is quite tedious:redface:!)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I know what range means, mr. iNCREDiBLE ...
(that's not the problem)

I just need a better notation for it!

From reading those pages, I suppose the notation would be
[tex]{R} \left\{ {t_1 ,t_2 , \ldots ,t_n } \right\}[/tex] ?

Am I correct ?
 
Last edited:
bomba923 said:
I know what range means, mr. iNCREDiBLE ...
(that's not the problem)

I just need a better notation for it!

From reading those pages, I suppose the notation would be
[tex]{R} \left\{ {t_1 ,t_2 , \ldots ,t_n } \right\}[/tex] ?

Am I correct ?

I know that you know what it means, mr. bomba923. I'm just trying to help you.
It says clearly that the range is denoted as [tex]R = max_j(t_j) - min_j(t_j)[/tex].
 
iNCREDiBLE said:
It says clearly that the range is denoted as [tex]R = max_j(t_j) - min_j(t_j)[/tex].

Which pretty much is the same as..
bomba923 said:
[tex]\max \left\{ {t_1 ,t_2 , \ldots ,t_n } \right\} - \min \left\{ {t_1 ,t_2 , \ldots ,t_n } \right\}[/tex]
Except for the subscripts identifying which variable is considered for maximums/minimums and that the sets are written in condensed form :cool:
 
Using "order stats" notation, you could write t(n:n) - t(1:n), could even write t(n) - t(1). Or you could type "XYZ" for range and then do a search-and-replace with the correct notation.
 
Hey, um, just one more notation question:
*Is it generally understood that [tex]\mathbb{Q}^ +[/tex] refers to the set of all positive rationals?
(just like [itex]\mathbb{R}^ +[/itex] refers to the set of all positive reals)

Right?
 
I am not a mathematician by trade, but I have seen both R+ and R+ to refer to positive reals; so by extrapolation I guess same notation would hold for Q as well.