Notation question: partial derivative with arrow

Click For Summary
The notation of a partial derivative with an arrow indicates the direction in which the derivative operates, either to the left or right. When the arrow points left, such as in f\overleftarrow{\nabla} g, it effectively means (\nabla f) g. This directional notation is useful in integration by parts, allowing for the manipulation of terms while maintaining clarity in the operations performed. Additionally, a double arrow notation, like \alpha \overleftrightarrow {\partial_\mu} \beta, represents a specific operation involving both terms, although its definition can vary. Understanding these notations is crucial for accurate interpretation in quantum field theory contexts.
redrzewski
Messages
115
Reaction score
0
I'm reading thru Brown's QFT.

He uses the notation of the gradient operator or a partial differentiation operater with an arrow over the operator. The arrow points either left or right.

Can someone please tell me what this means?

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It just denotes if the derivative is acting to the left or the right. You can usually change this direction by integration by parts.

if the arrow is point to the left and u had f\overleftarrow{\nabla} g it really just means (\nabla f) g.

So integrating:

\int d^4x f\overleftarrow{\nabla} g= [fg]-\int d^4x f\overrightarrow{\nabla} g, providing functions go to zero at infinity (compact support), you just throw away the [] term.

Translating into conventional notation:

\int d^4x (\nabla f) g= [fg]-\int d^4x f(\nabla g)
 
Last edited:
Two more things to add:

1. The reason one wants to do this is that when using the Feynman "slash" notation, the derivative operator also carries a gamma matrix, which can't be moved to the other side of the field being differentiated.

2. A derivative with a double arrow on top means:

\alpha \overleftrightarrow {\partial_\mu} \beta = (\partial_\mu \alpha) \beta - \alpha \partial_\mu \beta

But be careful, because sometimes this is defined to mean the other way around!
 
Thank you very much for the clarification.
 
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...