Notation relating to gamma matrices

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
9 replies · 4K views
vertices
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
Hi

My QFT course assumes the following notation for gamma matrices:

[tex]\gamma ^{\mu_1 \mu_2 \mu_3 \mu_4} = {\gamma ^ {[\mu_1}}{\gamma ^ {\mu_2}}{\gamma ^ {\mu_3}}{\gamma ^ {\mu_4 ]}}[/tex]

what does the thing on the right hand side actually mean? Its seems to be a commutator of some sort.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi vertices! :smile:

(have a gamma: γ and a mu: µ :wink:)

It means you add every possible permutation (just as in γµ[1µ2] you'd add every possible permutation, but there'd only be two of them! :wink:).
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi vertices! :smile:

(have a gamma: γ and a mu: µ :wink:)

It means you add every possible permutation (just as in γµ[1µ2] you'd add every possible permutation, but there'd only be two of them! :wink:).



Thanks tiny-tim:)

So for example, would I be right in saying that:

γµ1µ2µ1γµ2µ2γµ1?
 
Tiny-Tim forgot to tell you that you also must multiply each term by the sign of its permutation. That is, you must take a totally-antisymmetrized sum. You might also have to divide by N afterward, depending on the convention you're using (where N is the number of gamma matrices being antisymmetrized).
 
vertices said:
Thanks tiny-tim:)

So for example, would I be right in saying that:

γµ1µ2µ1γµ2µ2γµ1?

Actually, the usual definition for the square bracket, like [tex]\gamma^{\mu\nu} \equiv \gamma^{[\mu} \gamma^{\nu]}[/tex] is the anti-symmetrization of the indices. For this case I just mentioned,
[tex]\gamma^{\mu\nu} = \gamma^\mu\gamma^\nu - \gamma^\nu\gamma^\mu[/tex]
And for example,
[tex]\gamma^{\mu\nu\rho}<br /> \equiv \gamma^{[\mu}\gamma^{\nu}\gamma^{\rho]}<br /> = \frac{1}{3!}\left( \gamma^\mu\gamma^\nu\gamma^\rho - \gamma^\mu\gamma^\rho\gamma^\nu + \gamma^\nu\gamma^\rho\gamma^\mu -\gamma^\nu\gamma^\mu\gamma^\rho +\gamma^\rho\gamma^\mu\gamma^\nu -\gamma^\rho\gamma^\nu\gamma^\mu \right)[/tex]
 
Ben Niehoff said:
Tiny-Tim forgot to tell you that you also must multiply each term by the sign of its permutation. That is, you must take a totally-antisymmetrized sum. You might also have to divide by N afterward, depending on the convention you're using (where N is the number of gamma matrices being antisymmetrized).

sorry can I ask a stupid question: what is the 'sign' of a permutation?
 
ismaili said:
Actually, the usual definition for the square bracket, like [tex]\gamma^{\mu\nu} \equiv \gamma^{[\mu} \gamma^{\nu]}[/tex] is the anti-symmetrization of the indices. For this case I just mentioned,
[tex]\gamma^{\mu\nu} = \gamma^\mu\gamma^\nu - \gamma^\nu\gamma^\mu[/tex]
And for example,
[tex]\gamma^{\mu\nu\rho}<br /> \equiv \gamma^{[\mu}\gamma^{\nu}\gamma^{\rho]}<br /> = \frac{1}{3!}\left( \gamma^\mu\gamma^\nu\gamma^\rho - \gamma^\mu\gamma^\rho\gamma^\nu + \gamma^\nu\gamma^\rho\gamma^\mu -\gamma^\nu\gamma^\mu\gamma^\rho +\gamma^\rho\gamma^\mu\gamma^\nu -\gamma^\rho\gamma^\nu\gamma^\mu \right)[/tex]

can i ask you how the the sign of each term is determined? How do you decide which term is positive and which term is negative?

thanks.
 
Aahh I've figured it out i think - cyclic permutations are positive; anticyclic permutations are negative. A bit like the levi-civita thingy..
 
vertices said:
Aahh I've figured it out i think - cyclic permutations are positive; anticyclic permutations are negative. A bit like the levi-civita thingy..

This works for 3 indices or less. For N indices, you check whether it is an even or odd permutation of {1,2,3,4,...,N}. That is, you count the number of pairwise interchanges required to bring the indices back to numerical order. If it takes an even number of switches, the term gets a plus sign; otherwise, a minus sign.
 
Ben Niehoff said:
This works for 3 indices or less. For N indices, you check whether it is an even or odd permutation of {1,2,3,4,...,N}. That is, you count the number of pairwise interchanges required to bring the indices back to numerical order. If it takes an even number of switches, the term gets a plus sign; otherwise, a minus sign.

interesting. thanks for pointing this out Ben.