Nuclear Binding Energy (wikipedia is confusing)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Nuclear binding energy is defined as the energy required to split a nucleus of an atom into its constituent protons and neutrons. Additionally, the mass of a nucleus is always less than the sum of the individual masses of its nucleons, with the difference representing the nuclear binding energy that holds the nucleus together. Both definitions are accurate, but the first definition is considered more contemporary. The strong nuclear force and the repulsive electrical force between protons both influence the binding energy, with the former providing attraction and the latter contributing to instability in heavy nuclei.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of nuclear physics concepts
  • Familiarity with the strong nuclear force
  • Knowledge of mass-energy equivalence (E=mc²)
  • Basic grasp of atomic structure (protons and neutrons)
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the role of the strong nuclear force in atomic stability
  • Explore the concept of mass defect in nuclear physics
  • Learn about the stability of heavy nuclei and radioactive decay
  • Investigate applications of nuclear binding energy in nuclear reactors
USEFUL FOR

Students of nuclear physics, educators explaining atomic structure, and professionals in nuclear energy fields will benefit from this discussion on nuclear binding energy.

hms.tech
Messages
246
Reaction score
0
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_binding_energy

What is nuclear binding energy ?

Here are two possible answers according to the Wikipedia page :
1.Nuclear binding energy is the energy required to split a nucleus of an atom into its component parts.
2.Nuclei are made up of protons and neutron, but the mass of a nucleus is always less than the sum of the individual masses of the protons and neutrons which constitute it. The difference is a measure of the nuclear binding energy which holds the nucleus together.

Which one is it ?
Or
are both of them trying to tell the same thing ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
They are the same thing. The energy of a nucleus is less than the total energy of the individual nucleons, since the bound nucleus has lower potential energy. This energy difference is measurable as a difference in rest mass via ##E=mc^2##. If you want to split the nucleus apart, you need to add in enough energy to make up the difference.
 
Am I correct in thinking that this lowering of potential energy is caused by the strong nuclear force between any two nucleons ?
 
The (repulsive) electrical force also contributes to the binding energy. The binding energy is smaller than it would be if the nuclear force were the only one acting. This is what makes very heavy nuclei unstable: the electrical repulsion eventually overcomes the attraction of the nuclear force, when the number of protons is large enough.
 
jtbell said:
The (repulsive) electrical force also contributes to the binding energy. The binding energy is smaller than it would be if the nuclear force were the only one acting.

It would probably be less confusing to phrase that as, "The (repulsive) electrical force also detracts from the binding energy."
 
Correction accepted. :smile:

I tend to think of "contribute" as being either positive or negative, but I can see this might be confusing.
 
I understand, thank you

In summary both definitions are correct , its just that this one
Nuclear binding energy is the energy required to split a nucleus of an atom into its component parts.

is more modern (new)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K