Nuclear electricity separator - for those really picky customers

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of a nuclear electricity separator developed in the 1980s, which purportedly allows electricity generated from nuclear power to be returned to the grid for use by anti-nuclear homeowners. Participants explore the feasibility, implications, and societal attitudes towards nuclear energy and alternative energy sources.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express support for the nuclear electricity separator, suggesting it could be a national subsidized project.
  • Others argue against the necessity of prioritizing such projects over other infrastructure, questioning their practicality.
  • A participant defends nuclear power as the optimal energy source, citing its low emissions and compact nature compared to other energy sources.
  • Concerns are raised about the thread's intent, with some suggesting it may be an attempt to discredit anti-nuclear sentiments without substantial evidence.
  • Several participants express a humorous or skeptical attitude towards wind energy and other alternative energy sources, with some proposing fictional devices to filter out unwanted energy types.
  • References to various unconventional energy ideas are shared, with participants questioning their seriousness and potential funding eligibility.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus; multiple competing views on nuclear energy and alternative energy sources remain, with some expressing support for nuclear power while others critique it or express skepticism about alternative solutions.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes a mix of serious and humorous contributions, with some participants questioning the validity of certain energy concepts and the overall seriousness of the thread.

misgfool
I just read that back in the 80's our brilliant engineers developed a nuclear electricity separator, which returns all electricity generated by nuclear power back to the grid, so that even anti-nuclear homeowners could use electricity. Would you buy one?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
infinite series resistances installed on the service of anti-nuclear homeowners is the way to go. yes, i would buy them one. let's make this a national subsidized project.
 
Proton Soup said:
let's make this a national subsidized project.

Indeed, but should we prioritize this higher than building bridges to nowhere?
 
misgfool said:
Indeed, but should we prioritize this higher than building bridges to nowhere?

i can install these wireless interfaces for a nominal fee. in fact, the program will pay for itself in the first year.
 
misgfool said:
I just read that back in the 80's our brilliant engineers developed a nuclear electricity separator, which returns all electricity generated by nuclear power back to the grid, so that even anti-nuclear homeowners could use electricity. Would you buy one?

Hell no. Nuclear power is absolutely the best energy source to date, bar none. Everything else is either heavily CO2-emitting (coal, natural gas, oil) or has extravagant resource or land use requirements (hydropower, biomass, solar, wind, wave, tidal). But nuclear is at the intersection of - clean, compact, cheap. It is optimal.
 
We can see how the idea really took off. :rolleyes:

The real question is: Did anyone actually buy one?

This thread strikes me as a thinly veiled attempt to discredit the anti-nuclear-power crowd by implication without even offering evidence for the implication - a Foxism.
 
Last edited:
I'm not sure if this thread was intended to be serious or not...
 
I really hate wind...it just sort of scares me. Could I get a device to filter out wind-generated energy?
 
this message is printed on 100% recycled electrons.
 
  • #10
lisab said:
I really hate wind...it just sort of scares me. Could I get a device to filter out wind-generated energy?

Or maybe Disney energy? I hear it comes from the exploitation of animated animals, the poor cute little things.
 
  • #11
misgfool said:
should we prioritize this higher than building bridges to nowhere?

It depends. Do a bunch of minor idiots outweigh one world-class idiot?
 
  • #12
Ivan Seeking said:
This thread strikes me as a thinly veiled attempt to discredit the anti-nuclear-power crowd by implication without even offering evidence for the implication - a Foxism.

russ_watters said:
I'm not sure if this thread was intended to be serious or not...

Actually you are both right simultaneously. This article appeared in a respected university Mayday magazine in the 80's. The release appears once on every odd year and has so far appeared in the form a magazine, egg, milk can, tuna can etc. It typically has a fairly high humor value.
 
  • #13
lisab said:
I really hate wind...it just sort of scares me. Could I get a device to filter out wind-generated energy?

I thought once that ground level wind energy was the most ludicrous idea, but then I heard of carbon capture.
 
  • #14
My 10 year old produces "wind" with gale force...that can burn too.
 
  • #15
lisab said:
I really hate wind...it just sort of scares me. Could I get a device to filter out wind-generated energy?

Sure. If you pay for me flying there and back again I am going to install you one for free :wink:
 
  • #16
WhoWee said:
My 10 year old produces "wind" with gale force...that can burn too.

Speaking of which... we ate cooked sauerkraut for dinner tonight.
 
  • #17
misgfool said:
I thought once that ground level wind energy was the most ludicrous idea, but then I heard of carbon capture.

If that's the stupidest idea you've heard about, you are one lucky bastard. http://www.tuvie.com/environmentally-friendly-solar-shades-canopies

http://www.popularmechanics.com/blogs/science_news/4224574.html

Grad student invents gravity lamp

http://www.ecogeek.org/content/view/1383/

http://www.treehugger.com/files/2008/12/coffee-grounds-could-power-your-car.php

http://www.ecofriend.org/entry/eco-friendly-turbines-generate-power-from-a-flushing-toilet/ I think the mods will ban me for this...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #18
signerror said:
If that's the stupidest idea you've heard about, you are one lucky bastard.


http://www.tuvie.com/environmentally-friendly-solar-shades-canopies

http://www.popularmechanics.com/blogs/science_news/4224574.html

Grad student invents gravity lamp

http://www.ecogeek.org/content/view/1383/

http://www.treehugger.com/files/2008/12/coffee-grounds-could-power-your-car.php

http://www.ecofriend.org/entry/eco-friendly-turbines-generate-power-from-a-flushing-toilet/


I think the mods will ban me for this...


I have to wonder if any of these are eligible for stimulus funding?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #19
signerror said:
If that's the stupidest idea you've heard about, you are one lucky bastard.

...

I think the mods will ban me for this...

But those ideas are not considered seriously
 

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 75 ·
3
Replies
75
Views
16K