"Reversal" of Nuclear Decay in Beta Emitters

In summary, the conversation discusses the process of nuclear decay reversal in beta emitters and the role of neutrinos in converting protons into neutrons. It is mentioned that an energy of 1.29 MeV is enough to induce this conversion, but it is also noted that the actual energy required may vary depending on the specific nucleus involved. The concept of weak interaction and its low likelihood of occurrence is also mentioned, along with the potential for elastic scattering in high energy electron-nucleus interactions.
  • #1
Aakash Sunkari
13
1
Hello all,

I've got a question on nuclear decay "reversal" in beta emitters.

I've been researching the Cowan-Reines experiment, which used neutrinos to convert protons into neutrons. Recently, I found out that the particle which hits the proton need not necessarily be a neutrino in order to induce a proton-to-neutron conversion. It looks like an energy of 1.29 MeV is enough to convert a proton into a neutron.

That being said, there's a couple of questions that come to mind:

Say that we have a beta emitter which decays to a stable isotope. We use an accelerated electron of 1.29 MeV to convert one of the protons in the nucleus into a neutron.

But does this mean that the isotope will undergo the beta decay again, with the same energy value? Or does there need to be additional energy in order to not just convert a proton to a neutron, but to produce an electron as well?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
If you can get the reverse reaction with your electron beam then the produced nucleus can do beta decay again, sure. If your electron beam doesn't provide enough energy for a nuclear reaction then there won't be one.
 
  • #3
"We use an accelerated electron of 1.29 MeV to convert one of the protons in the nucleus into a neutron."
The process is e +p --> n +neutrino. A neutrino must always be involved. 1.29 MeV is the minimum possible energy, but the actual energy is always higher. Any beta decay energy is determined by the energy difference of two nuclear levels.
 
  • Like
Likes Aakash Sunkari
  • #4
If it's a proton in a (non-trivial) nucleus then the required energy can be lower or higher. It's no longer sufficient to treat the proton as isolated particle, the binding energy of the parent and possible daughter nucleus has to be considered. In some cases there is not even an energy threshold.
 
  • Like
Likes Aakash Sunkari
  • #5
Hi,

this is the state-of-the-art theoretical framework of electron capture
https://arxiv.org/pdf/nucl-th/0001018.pdf

Converting a proton into a neutron, or viceversa, involves weak interaction. As its own name says, it is not likely to happen. Reaction rate is given by

r = n1 * n2 * <sigma*v>

n1, n2 = density of two interacting particles
<sigma*v> = cross section averaged by Boltzmann distribution (it is a function on the temperature)

If cross-sections is low, you will need huge densities.

Coming back to shooting high energy electrons to nuclei... the most likely interaction will be elastic scattering, which was worth a Nobel prize

https://www.physi.uni-heidelberg.de...ysics/talks/schweiger_structure_of_nuclei.pdf

Regards,
ORF
 

What is "Reversal" of Nuclear Decay in Beta Emitters?

Reversal of nuclear decay in beta emitters refers to the phenomenon where a beta decay process is reversed, resulting in the conversion of a beta particle back into its original form.

Is "Reversal" of Nuclear Decay in Beta Emitters possible?

Yes, it is possible to reverse nuclear decay in beta emitters through a process called electron capture. In this process, an electron is captured by the nucleus, causing a proton to be converted into a neutron and releasing a neutrino.

What are the potential applications of "Reversal" of Nuclear Decay in Beta Emitters?

The ability to reverse nuclear decay in beta emitters has potential applications in nuclear waste management, as it could potentially be used to convert radioactive elements into stable or less harmful forms. It could also have implications in nuclear medicine, where it could be used to produce short-lived isotopes for medical imaging.

What are the challenges in achieving "Reversal" of Nuclear Decay in Beta Emitters?

One of the main challenges in achieving reversal of nuclear decay in beta emitters is the low probability of electron capture occurring. This process is highly dependent on the energy levels and configurations of the nucleus, making it difficult to control and predict. Additionally, the energy required for electron capture is often high, making it a technically challenging process to achieve.

Are there any ethical concerns surrounding "Reversal" of Nuclear Decay in Beta Emitters?

At this time, there are no known ethical concerns surrounding the reversal of nuclear decay in beta emitters. However, as with any new technology, it is important to carefully consider the potential risks and benefits before implementing it on a larger scale.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
85
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
32
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
909
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
798
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
908
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
27
Views
4K
Back
Top