I Nuclear knockout reactions - why does a proton knockout a neutron?

skh149
Messages
6
Reaction score
5
TL;DR Summary
Questions about the formation of F-18 from O-18; why a neutron is selectively knocked out, how do the charges balance out
I am studying the synthesis of FDG for a job interview. The process of creating the F-18 used in FDG involves the collision of O-18 with an accelerated proton -- the proton kicks out a neutron and everything adds up. I am just wondering why a neutron is specifically knocked out, why wouldn't another proton be kicked out instead? Is it 50/50 but the proton exchange is essentially no change at all? Thanks for any replies.

Bonus question: I might make this a separate post. But when the F-18 is formed it would be positively charged. I believe it quickly turns into an anion but still, the charges would not be balanced in the system (correct?). Would the solution have an overall electrical charge? Are electrons stripped from the environment? (In chemistry you usually can't just add a charged particle to a solution without its opposite charge. I.e. Na+Cl- )
 
Physics news on Phys.org
O-18 + p -> O-18 + p is a possible (and even likely) reaction, it's just not the reaction people are interested in. You can't control what reaction happens but you can bombard oxygen (or water) with enough protons and then separate out fluorine.

It's an ion briefly but it will quickly capture a random electron from the environment.
Your proton beam is a source of positive charges but grounding the equipment keeps it neutral.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top