Nullity of Linear Transformation T:M_2x3(F) -> M_2x2(F): 4

  • Thread starter Thread starter _F_
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
3 replies · 3K views
_F_
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the nullity of the linear transformation T:M_2x3(F) -> M_2x2(F) defined by:

T([a11, a12, a13; a21, a22, a23]) = ([2*a11 - a12, a13 + 2*a12; 0, 0])


The Attempt at a Solution


N(T) = {x in M_2x3(F) | T(x) = 0}

2*a11 - a12 = 0 => a11 = (a12)/2
a13 + 2*12 = 0 a13 = -2*a12

N(T) = {[a/2, a, -2*a; 0, 0, 0] | a in F}

Basis(N(T)) = {[1/2 1 -2; 0, 0, 0]}

nullity(T) = 6

But nullity(T) should be 4...

Any help is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
_F_ said:
N(T) = {[a/2, a, -2*a; 0, 0, 0] | a in F}
Basis(N(T)) = {[1/2 1 -2; 0, 0, 0]}
nullity(T) = 6
But nullity(T) should be 4...
Why are these entries 0's? Look at the formula given for T. Do a21,a22,a23 appear anywhere in the transformed 2x2 matrix?
 
Defennder said:
Why are these entries 0's? Look at the formula given for T. Do a21,a22,a23 appear anywhere in the transformed 2x2 matrix?

You're right. But that said, if you take away the zero's you still get a 1x3 matrix whose dimension is 3...
 
You meant I a 2x3 matrix I presume. And it doesn't make sense to talk about the dimension of a matrix. You meant the dimension of the nullspace. And it isn't 3. How did you arrive at that?