Nullity of Linear Transformation T:M_2x3(F) -> M_2x2(F): 4

  • Thread starter Thread starter _F_
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the nullity of a linear transformation T from M_2x3(F) to M_2x2(F), defined by a specific transformation formula. Participants are examining the implications of the transformation on the null space and its dimension.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the definition of the null space N(T) and its basis, questioning the presence of certain matrix entries in the transformation. They explore the implications of the zero entries in the transformed matrix and how that affects the dimension of the null space.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants questioning the calculations and assumptions regarding the nullity. There is a recognition of differing interpretations of the transformation's impact on the null space, but no consensus has been reached yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the definitions and properties of linear transformations and their null spaces, with some confusion about the dimensions involved and the significance of specific matrix entries in the transformation process.

_F_
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the nullity of the linear transformation T:M_2x3(F) -> M_2x2(F) defined by:

T([a11, a12, a13; a21, a22, a23]) = ([2*a11 - a12, a13 + 2*a12; 0, 0])


The Attempt at a Solution


N(T) = {x in M_2x3(F) | T(x) = 0}

2*a11 - a12 = 0 => a11 = (a12)/2
a13 + 2*12 = 0 a13 = -2*a12

N(T) = {[a/2, a, -2*a; 0, 0, 0] | a in F}

Basis(N(T)) = {[1/2 1 -2; 0, 0, 0]}

nullity(T) = 6

But nullity(T) should be 4...

Any help is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
_F_ said:
N(T) = {[a/2, a, -2*a; 0, 0, 0] | a in F}
Basis(N(T)) = {[1/2 1 -2; 0, 0, 0]}
nullity(T) = 6
But nullity(T) should be 4...
Why are these entries 0's? Look at the formula given for T. Do a21,a22,a23 appear anywhere in the transformed 2x2 matrix?
 
Defennder said:
Why are these entries 0's? Look at the formula given for T. Do a21,a22,a23 appear anywhere in the transformed 2x2 matrix?

You're right. But that said, if you take away the zero's you still get a 1x3 matrix whose dimension is 3...
 
You meant I a 2x3 matrix I presume. And it doesn't make sense to talk about the dimension of a matrix. You meant the dimension of the nullspace. And it isn't 3. How did you arrive at that?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K