Number Density of Photons (Cosmology)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around estimating the number density of photons emitted by stars over the history of the universe, given the maximum possible number density of stars and their energy output. The context is cosmology, specifically focusing on stellar radiation and photon density.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore how to relate the energy radiated by stars to the number of photons emitted, questioning the necessary equations and the role of wavelength in these calculations.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the relationship between energy and photon emission, suggesting the use of the Planck relation. There is an ongoing exploration of how to correctly apply these concepts to find the photon rate from the given energy output.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the assumption that the maximum number density of stars is based on the current baryon density and are considering the implications of using a specific wavelength for the calculations. There is a noted emphasis on understanding the physics rather than just applying equations.

roam
Messages
1,265
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement



Given the maximum possible number density of stars in the present universe, assume that they have been radiating light for 10 billion years at a solar rate of ##3.9 \times 10^{26} \ W##. Photons emitted all have a restframe wavelength of 500 nm. Find a crude upper bound for the number density of photons emitted by stars over the history of universe.

First find the maximum number density of stars in the present universe if all baryons were assembled into solar mass stars.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I have previously found a number density of stars to be:

##n= \frac{\rho}{m}= \frac{\rho_{crit} \Omega_b}{m}=2.225 \times 10^{-58} \ m^-3##

##6.54 \times 10^{-9} \ pc^{-3}##

The calculation was made given the sun weighs ##2 \times 10^{30}##, and a baryon fraction ##\Omega_b=0.05## today. (##\rho_{crit}## was worked out by finding ##H_0##)

So, now what equation do I need to use to find the number density of photons emitted? Do I need to multiply the number density by solar rate? How do I take into account the wavelength of the radiation? :confused:

Any help is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are given the rate each star radiates energy, not photons. What do you have to do to get the rate each star radiates photons?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: roam
Simon Bridge said:
You are given the rate each star radiates energy, not photons. What do you have to do to get the rate each star radiates photons?

Frankly, I'm not sure what equation to use here for finding the photon rate. Do we need to somehow use the Planck relation ##E=hc/\lambda##? (that's the only way I can think of that wavelength comes into the picture)
 
It looks like you are trying to solve physics problems by looking up equations instead of by understanding the physics involved.
This is not a good strategy.

Lets turn it around:
Consider a single photon with wavelength 440nm ... how much energy does it carry?
If a source were to radiate 1W or power, then how many of those photons per second need to be radiated?
 
Simon Bridge said:
Lets turn it around:
Consider a single photon with wavelength 440nm ... how much energy does it carry?
If a source were to radiate 1W or power, then how many of those photons per second need to be radiated?

I need to divide the required power (1 W) by the energy of a single photon (##hc/440 \ nm = 4.5 \times 10^{-19} W##). So ~2.2x1018 photons are required per second.

So, in my problem I simply need to divide the given solar rate by the energy of a single 550 nm photon? Is that right?

i.e.: (3.9 x 1026)/(hc/500 nm)= 9.8039 x 1044
 
Well that's what the physics is telling you. See how talking about it as the energy of one photon is better as a guide to your thinking than thinking of it as this equation that seems to have the right bits in it somehow?

Don't forget units, don't forget correct rounding.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: roam

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K