Number of Partitions of n into j Parts not Exceeding m?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter poissonspot
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Partition
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the mathematical problem of determining the number of integer partitions of a number \( n \) into \( j \) parts, where each part does not exceed \( m \). It is established that the number of partitions of \( n \) into parts not exceeding \( m \) is equivalent to the number of partitions of \( n \) into \( m \) or fewer parts. The conversation highlights the complexity of calculating these partitions and introduces multinomial coefficients as a potential method for finding solutions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integer partitions in number theory
  • Familiarity with multinomial coefficients
  • Basic knowledge of combinatorial mathematics
  • Ability to work with inequalities and summations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of integer partitions and their applications
  • Study multinomial coefficients and their role in combinatorial problems
  • Explore generating functions for integer partitions
  • Investigate algorithms for calculating partitions of integers
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying combinatorics, and anyone interested in advanced number theory and partition problems.

poissonspot
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
Remember that the number of partitions of n into parts not exceeding m is equal to the number of partitions of n into m or fewer parts? Does anyone know much about the number of partitions of n into m parts not exceeding m?

Thanks!

Edit: Or more generally, the number of partitions of n into j parts not exceeding m?
Thanks again,
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
conscipost said:
Remember that the number of partitions of n into parts not exceeding m is equal to the number of partitions of n into m or fewer parts? Does anyone know much about the number of partitions of n into m parts not exceeding m?

Thanks!

Edit: Or more generally, the number of partitions of n into j parts not exceeding m?
Thanks again,

All right, so after trying to make sense of your post, I've decided that there are the following distinct questions to be answered here:

1: In how many ways can one partition $n$ objects into groups of less than $m$
2: In how many ways can one partition $n$ objects into $m$ or fewer groups
3: In how many ways can one partition $n$ objects into $j$ parts not exceeding $m$

Please correct me if you meant something else.
 
TheBigBadBen said:
All right, so after trying to make sense of your post, I've decided that there are the following distinct questions to be answered here:

1: In how many ways can one partition $n$ objects into groups of less than $m$
2: In how many ways can one partition $n$ objects into $m$ or fewer groups
3: In how many ways can one partition $n$ objects into $j$ parts not exceeding $m$

Please correct me if you meant something else.

Hey, I'm just talking about integer partitions, but I'm sorry about the lack of clarity. I think it's well known that the number of partitions of an integer n w/ largest part m is equal to the number of partitions of n with m parts a statement equivalent to the first line "Remember".

However, I'm really interested in the question of how many integer partitions of n with j parts have parts not exceeding m.

Does that clarify things a little?
 
Last edited:
conscipost said:
Hey, I'm just talking about integer partitions, but I'm sorry about the lack of clarity. I think it's well known that the number of partitions of an integer n w/ largest part m is equal to the number of partitions of n with m parts a statement equivalent to the first line "Remember".

However, I'm really interested in the question of how many integer partitions of n with j parts have parts not exceeding m.

Does that clarify things a little?

I realize you mean for $m,n,j$ to be integers. It's still a tough problem.

After looking carefully, the link wasn't as related as I thought, so sorry about that.

Some things I figured out that might help: you can add up the multinomial coefficients
$$
\binom{n}{k_1,k_2,...,k_m}
$$
Over all choices of $k_j$ such that $0≤k_j≤n$, not counting repeating combinations of $k_j$, and $\sum_{j=1}^m k_j=n$, which I haven't found a way to simplify.

Or, if we're looking at the wider version of the problem where we have labeled parts $A_1,A_2,...,A_m$, then the number of ways you can distribute the $n$ objects to the $m$ sets (including potentially empty $A_j$s) is simply $m^n$.
 
Last edited:
TheBigBadBen said:
I realize you mean for $m,n,j$ to be integers. It's still a tough problem.

After looking carefully, the link wasn't as related as I thought, so sorry about that.

Some things I figured out that might help: you can add up the multinomial coefficients
$$
\binom{n}{k_1,k_2,...,k_m}
$$
Over all choices of $k_j$ such that $0≤k_j≤n$, not counting repeating combinations of $k_j$, and $\sum_{j=1}^m k_j=n$, which I haven't found a way to simplify.

Or, if we're looking at the wider version of the problem where we have labeled parts $A_1,A_2,...,A_m$, then the number of ways you can distribute the $n$ objects to the $m$ sets (including potentially empty $A_j$s) is simply $m^n$.

Thanks again.
What I am hoping to find is the number of j-tuples of positive integers that are non increasing so that a0+a1+...+aj=n and ai is less than or equal to m.
Partition (number theory) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K