MHB Number of Possible Sums with 1-15 Cards

  • Thread starter Thread starter WMDhamnekar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cards Sums
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the number of distinct sums possible with a set of cards numbered 10, 100, and 500. The initial answer proposed is 143, but some participants argue that at least two cards are needed for a sum, leading to a different calculation method involving combinations. One user claims to have found 141 distinct sums and questions which sums might be missing to reach the total of 143. There is also mention of a formula for calculating distinct sums, but clarity on its application in this context remains unresolved. The conversation highlights confusion over the correct interpretation of the problem and the calculation methods used.
WMDhamnekar
MHB
Messages
376
Reaction score
28
There are 8 cards with number 10 on them, 5 cards with number 100 on them and 2 cards with number 500 on them. How many distinct sums are possible using from 1 to all of the 15 cards?Answer given is 143. But my logic is for any sum, at least 2 numbers are needed. So, there are $\binom{15} {2} + \binom{15}{3}+...\binom{15}{15} $ distinct sums. So, I think answer 143 is wrong.
What is your opinion?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
\begin{pmatrix}15 \\ 2 \end{pmatrix} is the number of sums of two of the numbers, \begin{pmatrix}15 \\ 3 \end{pmatrix} is the number of sums of three of the numbers, etc. But they won't be distinct sums.
 
Dhamnekar Winod said:
There are 8 cards with number 10 on them, 5 cards with number 100 on them and 2 cards with number 500 on them. How many distinct sums are possible using from 1 to all of the 15 cards?Answer given is 143. But my logic is for any sum, at least 2 numbers are needed. So, there are $\binom{15} {2} + \binom{15}{3}+...\binom{15}{15} $ distinct sums. So, I think answer 143 is wrong.
What is your opinion?

The directions clearly state from 1 to 15, so their solution is based on that premise.
 
CountryBoy said:
\begin{pmatrix}15 \\ 2 \end{pmatrix} is the number of sums of two of the numbers, \begin{pmatrix}15 \\ 3 \end{pmatrix} is the number of sums of three of the numbers, etc. But they won't be distinct sums.

Hello,

I have computed 141 distinct sums. But the answer is 143. Which 2 distinct sums i omitted, would you tell me? Is the answer 143 wrong? All the 141 distinct sums are

20,30,40,50,60,70,80,110,120,130,140,150,160,170,180,200,210,220,230,240,250,260,270,280,300,310,320,330,340,350,360,370,380,400,410,420,430,440,450,460,470,480,500,510,520,530,540,550,560,570,580,600,610,620,630,640,650,660,670,680,700,710,720,730,740,750,760,770,780,800,810,820,830,840,850,860,870,880,900,910,920,930,940,950,960,970,980,1000,1010,1020,1030,1040,1050,1060,1070,1080,1100,1110,1120,1130,1140,1150,1160,1170,1180,1200,1210,1220,1230,1240,1250,1260,1270,1280,1300,1310,1320,1330,1340,1350,1360,1370,1380,1400,1410,1420,1430,1440,1450,1460,1470,1480,1500,1510,1520,1530,1540,1550,1560,1570,1580.


I know one formula $\binom{r+n-1}{r-n+1}$ which computes distinct sums, where n=cells and r= balls. How to use that here? Or is there any other formula?
 
Last edited:
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top