[Number Theory] Prove (x^2 - y^2) is not equal to 6.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that for any positive integers x and y, the expression (x^2 - y^2) is not equal to 6. The proof utilizes contradiction by assuming (x^2 - y^2) = 6 and factoring it into (x+y)(x-y) = 6. Various integer factor pairs of 6 are examined, leading to the conclusion that x and y must be fractions, which contradicts the assumption that x and y are positive integers. Additionally, participants discuss the monotonicity of the function x^2 - (x-1)^2, confirming it is always increasing for x > 0.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic algebra and factorization
  • Familiarity with proof by contradiction
  • Knowledge of monotonic functions and their properties
  • Basic number theory concepts, particularly regarding integers
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of monotonic functions in detail
  • Learn about proof techniques in number theory, especially proof by contradiction
  • Explore integer factorization and its applications in algebra
  • Investigate the implications of polynomial functions and their behavior
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for students of discrete mathematics, particularly those studying number theory, as well as educators and anyone interested in mathematical proofs and functions.

razefast
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Prove the following proposition: For any positive integers x and y, (x^2 - y^2) is not equal to 6.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



I'll try to prove using contradition.
Assume x^2 - y^2 = 6.
(x+y)(x-y) = 6

(x+y)=6 and (x-y)=1 (OR)
(x+y)=1 and (x-y)=6 (OR)
(x+y)=-6 and (x-y)=-1 (OR)
(x+y)=-1 and (x-y)=-6 (OR)
(x+y)=2 and (x-y)=3 (OR)
(x+y)=3 and (x-y)=2 (OR)
(x+y)=-2 and (x-y)=-3 (OR)
(x+y)=-3 and (x-y)=-2

When I solve those equations, x and y turns out to be fractions.
Therefore, there is a contradition.
Therefore, (x+y)(x-y) is not equal to 6.
--------------------------------------
Hi fellow physicsforumers
This is my first post. :D
I just started my discrete maths course at uni.
Is my solution correct?
Even if it is, is there any simpler way?
Thanks,
razefast
 
Physics news on Phys.org
so its a proof of contradiction using cases - looks reasonable to me, though haven't done a heap of number theory

i think though you need to state somewhere that the only 2 integer factorisations of 6 are
1.6
2.3
-2.-3
-1.-6

interestingly, the brute force method is almost quicker here
clearly x>y>0 for this to be true
so say
x=2, y=1, x^2-y^2=3
x=3, y=2, x^2-y^2=5
x=3, y=1, x^2-y^2=8
x=4, y=3, x^2-y^2=7

however you would also need to show x^2-(x-1)^2 is an monotonically increasing function, but that shouldn't be too hard
 
Hi lanedance,

Actually, I have no idea how to prove x^2-(x-1)^2 is an monotonically increasing function :(
I have never learned about monotonic function so I had to google it but still confused. lol
Thanks for your reply lanedance :D

With regards,
razefast
 
x^2 - (x-1)^2 is easy to prove as monotonic, even without calculus. I will give a different example so you get the idea.

Monotonically Increasing Proof:
f(x) = x^2+3x+1
Prove that f(x) is monotonically increasing for x>0, that is,
If 0<a<b, then f(a)<f(b)

Let d=b-a => b=a+d.
f(b)=f(a+d)=(a+d)^2 + 3(a+d) +1 = a^2 + 2ad + d^2 + 3a + 3d + 1 = f(a) + (2a + d + 3)d
Now since 0<a<b, b-a>0 and so d>0. Thus (2a + d + 3)d > 0, and so f(b)>f(a).

The problem of proving x^2 - (x-1)^2 is monotonic should be similar. In fact, it is a little algebraically simpler, and you should not need a restriction of x>0.
 
adding onto process91's comments

monotonically increasing means it is always increasing as x gets bigger, or the derivative is always greater than zero

in terms of the proof, we just want to show the gap between x^2 and (x-1)^2 is always greater than 6 for x>4. That way we don't have to check any values of x>4

now expanding the difference
x^2-(x-1)^2 = x^2-(x^2-2x+1) = 2x-1

which is a straight line, hopefully you can convince yourself this is always increasing.

Now say you have two integers s and t, if t>s can you show 2t+1>2s+1? That would be enough.

All that said your original proof was fine with the extra line
. This is just another way of looking at it.
 
Hi lanedance and process91

Those explanations are quite clear.
I learned new things today.
Thx for helping out de newbie xD
Man..Physics forums is great ^^
 
Here's another way, let x = y + k and try to derive a contradiction.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
958