MHB Numerical Analysis problem Newton's method

carrab
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
View attachment 6617

Can anyone help in the solution of this problem? how can i determine the zero x*??
 

Attachments

  • problem 2.PNG
    problem 2.PNG
    5.6 KB · Views: 134
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello, and welcome to MHB, carrab! (Wave)

To find the zero, I would equate the function $f$ to zero, and solve for $x$:

$$f(x)=0$$

$$x^3-8=0$$

$$x^3-2^3=0$$

When you factor as the difference of cubes, what do you find?
 
"Newton's method" is a numerical method for solving an equation that basically replaces the function at a given value of x by the tangent function at that point. Here the function is f(x)= x^3- 8 which has derivative f'(x)= 3x^2, the derivative at x_0 f(x_0)= 3x_0^2 while the value of the function is x_0^3- 8. So the tangent function at x= x_0 is y= 3x_0^2(x- x_0)+ x_0^3- 8. Setting that equal to 0, 3x_0^2(x- x_0)+ x_0^3- 8= 0, 3x_0^2(x- x_0)= 8- x_0^3, x- x_0= \frac{8- x_0^3}{3x_0^2}, and x= x_0+ \frac{8- x_0^3}{3x_0^2}.

Start with some reasonable value for x_0 and calculate the next value for x: with, say, x_0= 1, x= 1+ \frac{8- 1}{3}= 1+ \frac{7}{3}= \frac{10}{3}. Now take x_0= \frac{10}{3} and calculate the next value for x. Repeat until you get two consecutive values for x that are closer together than your allowable error.

x_0= 0 is not a "good" starting value (in fact, it is impossible) because the denominator, 3x_0^2, would be 0.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top