Numerical Facts about the Milky way's halo

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the density, scale radius, and normal radius of the Milky Way's halo for input into the Navarro-Frenk-White (NFW) profile. It highlights the challenge of obtaining definitive values for scale density (rho_0) due to its degeneracy with scale radius (R_s). The conversation emphasizes that expressing halo profiles in terms of maximum circular velocity (v_max) is often more effective than relying on rho_0. A link to a relevant research paper was provided for further details.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Navarro-Frenk-White (NFW) profile
  • Familiarity with astrophysical concepts of density and scale radius
  • Knowledge of maximum circular velocity (v_max) in galactic dynamics
  • Basic comprehension of halo models in cosmology
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Navarro-Frenk-White (NFW) profile in detail
  • Explore methods for calculating maximum circular velocity (v_max)
  • Investigate the implications of density degeneracy in halo modeling
  • Read the linked research paper for advanced insights on halo parameters
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, and cosmologists interested in galactic structure and halo modeling will benefit from this discussion.

majormuss
Messages
124
Reaction score
4
I am trying to find the density, scale radius and normal radius of the milky way's halo. But these things are pretty hard to find. I want to find them so I can input them into the NFW profile:
760e366561387be89639a1aab92a56b0.png
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
In this thread I gave some constants of a proposed halo model as well as a link to a paper with more detail.
 
This may be a nitpick (depending on what you are trying to achieve) but the scale density is not a "numerical fact" because it is degenerate with the scale radius when you express the NFW profile as you have done. For any set of data there is a range of pairs of values rho_0 and R_s that all fit well enough, so you can't say any particular value of rho_0 is a "fact". Its often better with these halo profiles to express them in terms of v_max instead of rho_0.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 87 ·
3
Replies
87
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K