Nusselt number is variable or constant for laminar fully developed pipe flow?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Maulik Chaudhary
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    laminar Pipe
Click For Summary
The Nusselt number for fully developed laminar flow in a pipe is 4.36 for constant heat flux and 3.66 for constant wall temperature, indicating it is not constant across different boundary conditions. The formula Nu = h D/K suggests a constant value, but this applies primarily to long pipes where the flow is fully developed. In shorter pipes, the Nusselt number varies along the length due to the influence of boundary conditions. The differences arise because the heat transfer coefficient (h) changes based on these conditions. Thus, the Nusselt number is not a single constant value but varies depending on the specific heat transfer scenario.
Maulik Chaudhary
Messages
1
Reaction score
2
It is the case that the Nusselt number along the fully developed (hydrodynamically and thermally) laminar flow through the constant cross section is 4.36 for constant heat flux and 3.66 for constant wall temperature. But the formula of the nusselt number is Nu = h Lc/K so for pipe it becomes Nu = h D/K where all of the terms are constant so my question is why does it have 2 different values for the different cases shown above when the formula clearly indicates that it should be constant irrespective of other conditions?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Why do you think it is constant? Do you know what the h stands for?
 
The values you gas are asymptotic values for very long pipes. For shorter pipes, Nu varies along the length of the pipe. Also, Nu depends on the wall boundary conditions (constant temperature vs constant heat flux).
 
My idea is that I want to use immerse Whitetail Antlers in a fishtank to measure their volumetric displacement (the Boone and Crockett system is the current record measurement standard to place in a juxtaposition with) I would use some sight glass plumbed into the side of the tank to get the change in height so that I can multiply by the tank cross-section. Simple Idea. But... Is there a simple mechanical way to amplify the height in the sight glass to increase measurement precision...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
Replies
14
Views
10K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
36K