NYTimes Feature on James "The Amazing" Randi

  • Thread starter Thread starter Doc Al
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers around the NY Times article titled "The Unbelievable Skepticism of the Amazing Randi," which highlights the life and tricks of James Randi, originally known as Randall Zwinge. The discussion reveals Randi's unique method of predicting his own death as a performance art, showcasing his skepticism and critique of media sensationalism. Participants express admiration for Randi's contributions to skepticism and mention the need for more figures like him in today's media landscape, emphasizing the decline of investigative journalism.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of skepticism and its role in media.
  • Familiarity with James Randi's work and legacy.
  • Knowledge of the impact of sensationalism in journalism.
  • Awareness of modern media trends, including reality television.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research James Randi's performances and contributions to skepticism.
  • Explore the evolution of investigative journalism and its current state.
  • Analyze the impact of reality TV on public perception and media consumption.
  • Learn about contemporary skeptics and debunkers, such as Derren Brown.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for skeptics, media analysts, journalists, and anyone interested in the intersection of entertainment and critical thinking in modern media.

Doc Al
Mentor
Messages
45,581
Reaction score
2,445
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dembadon and DennisN
Physics news on Phys.org
Great article. What a life that guy has had.

I was really tickled by a paragraph late in the article:
When he was still a young man appearing in Toronto nightclubs and pretending to predict the future, Randall Zwinge created what he hoped would be his greatest trick. Each night before he went to bed, he wrote the date on the back of a business card along with the words “I, Randall Zwinge, will die today.” Then he signed it and placed it in his wallet. That way, if he were knocked down in the street or killed by a freak accident, whoever went through his effects would discover the most shocking prophecy he ever made. Zwinge kept at it for years. Each night, he tore up one card and wrote out a new one for the next day. But nothing fatal befell him; in the end, having wasted hundreds of business cards, he gave up in frustration. “I never got lucky,” he told me.
 
Nice to read!
By the way, here is the TED talk mentioned in the article:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Greg Bernhardt
That's quite an article.
When the hoax was revealed a few days later on “60 Minutes,” the Australian media was enraged at having been taken in; Randi countered that none of the journalists had bothered with even the most elementary fact-checking measures.
So, the media gets enraged because they got caught for failing to do their work - investigative journalism. Well - That's Entertainment!
 
Astronuc said:
That's quite an article.
So, the media gets enraged because they got caught for failing to do their work - investigative journalism. Well - That's Entertainment!
and pretty much to be expected THESE days but it was, I think, less common back then. They really dropped the ball.
 
phinds said:
and pretty much to be expected THESE days but it was, I think, less common back then. They really dropped the ball.
Sometimes I wonder. I strongly dislike sensationalism, and that seems to be what news is about these days, or at least the headline/mainstream media. I want information, not infotainment.
 
Astronuc said:
Sometimes I wonder. I strongly dislike sensationalism, and that seems to be what news is about these days, or at least the headline/mainstream media. I want information, not infotainment.
Sure. So do I. But the networks are not not in business to give us what we want they are in the business of making money so they give out what MOST people want, which is FOX News and The Housewives of New Jersey. This is sound business on their part.
 
phinds said:
Sure. So do I. But the networks are not not in business to give us what we want they are in the business of making money so they give out what MOST people want, which is FOX News and The Housewives of New Jersey. This is sound business on their part.
I think a minority 'want' to watch dysfunctional reality TV. It's probably reality for some folks, but not the majority, or at least I hope that's not the case. I don't care for FOX news, but I wouldn't necessarily put them in the same group as 'Housewives', although I wonder about some of the personalities. Then again, I find some personalities in the broader media landscape are full of themselves to the detriment of the reporting.

Call me a cynic, although I try not be.
 
Astronuc said:
I think a minority 'want' to watch dysfunctional reality TV.
Ratings say otherwise. Networks follow the ratings. Why do you think there are so many "reality" TV shows on the air? Profit makers pander to the majority, not the minority.
 
  • #10
Love me some James Randi, we need more people like him!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DrClaude
  • #11
Greg Bernhardt said:
Love me some James Randi, we need more people like him!
+1 on that !
 
  • #12
Greg Bernhardt said:
Love me some James Randi, we need more people like him!
There's at least one major one; Derren Brown is certainly following in Houdini and Randi's footsteps as a performer/debunker.
 
  • #13
I hope the JREF site improves now that he's once again taking on a more active role. For a couple of years it seemed like just a platform for two bloggers, and even the old archives--the best part--were taken down. Fingers crossed...
 
  • #14
  • #15
Great stuff. I subscribed to the Skeptical Inquirer for many years. :-)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
656
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
12K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K