Ω=0 and its magnitude for a unit pulse

  • Level: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter PainterGuy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Magnitude Pulse Unit
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
4 replies · 2K views · last reply
PainterGuy
Messages
938
Reaction score
73
Hi,

I was trying to find the magnitude of DC signal in a shifted unit pulse signal. The unshifted pulse lasts from -π to π and then it is shifted by π duration.

In Method #1 I have used FT formula and ended up with magnitude of 6.2832 for DC signal, i.e. ω=0.

In Method #2 I have used Laplace transform to derive the FT by setting σ=0 and ended up with magnitude of 6.5938 for the DC signal, i.e. ω=0.

What is contributing toward the error of 6.5938-6.2832=0.3106?

Could you please help me with it? Thank you!

Method #1:
Handwritten-style typed derivation of the shifted unit pulse Fourier transform: shift property e^(iωt_d)·F(ω), F(ω)=2sin(ωπ)/ω for pulse from -π to π, limit at ω=0 equal to 2π, and shifted transform as cos and sin terms.


Finding magnitude of DC signal:
Handwritten-style derivation of the magnitude of cos(ωt_d)·2sin(ωπ)/ω − j·sin(ωt_d)·2sin(ωπ)/ω at ω = 0, reducing via limit to 2π = 6.2832.
Method #2:
Handwritten derivation of the Fourier transform of u(t) - u(t-2π) from its Laplace transform, substituting s = jω and expanding with cos and sin terms, ending with a sinc-form expression.


Finding magnitude of DC signal:
Handwritten-style Mathcad worksheet deriving the magnitude of Expression (2π sin(2πω)/(2πω)) minus j(ω·ω·cos(2πω)/ω²) as ω tends to 0, with the final value 6.5938 highlighted in yellow.
 
Attachments
  • Handwritten-style derivation in red: Laplace transform of u(t)-u(t-2π) as 1/s - e^(2πs)/s, then Fourier transform by setting s=jω, giving sin(2πω)/ω and cos terms, simplified toward sinc form.
    1588132494144.png
    48 KB · Views: 393
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I was able to trace the problem. Method #1 produces the right answer.

There is a mistake Method #2. I have the step where the mistake occurred but even after fixing it, I couldn't simplify it any further. Could you please help me with it?

Please note that I didn't write lim_ω→0 with every step. Thank you

Handwritten-style algebra in red and black showing a limit as omega approaches 0 of the magnitude of 2pi sin(2pi omega)/(2pi omega) minus j times (omega minus omega cos(2pi omega))/omega squared, simplified step by step with one line highlighted in yellow.
 
Yes, you got the right answer in method #1. For method #2 you have,$$
\frac{1}{s}-\frac{e^{2\pi s}}{s}\rightarrow \frac{1}{j\omega}-\frac{e^{2\pi j \omega}}{j\omega} =e^{j\pi \omega}(\frac{e^{-j\pi \omega}-e^{j\pi \omega}}{j\omega})=-e^{j\pi \omega}\frac{2\sin(\pi \omega)}{\omega}$$Taking the absolute value, you recover the answer from method #1
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
Fred Wright said:
Yes, you got the right answer in method #1. For method #2 you have,$$
\frac{1}{s}-\frac{e^{2\pi s}}{s}\rightarrow \frac{1}{j\omega}-\frac{e^{2\pi j \omega}}{j\omega} =e^{j\pi \omega}(\frac{e^{-j\pi \omega}-e^{j\pi \omega}}{j\omega})=-e^{j\pi \omega}\frac{2\sin(\pi \omega)}{\omega}$$Taking the absolute value, you recover the answer from method #1

Thank you!

But I was purposely trying to avoid exponentials. Is there any way to simplify the trigonometric expression in Method #2 further?
 
Hi,

I was able to fix Method #2 and got the correct answer.

Handwritten-style typeset derivation in red: expression (2π sin(2πω)/2πω) − j((ω − ω cos(2πω))/ω²), then the limit as ω→0 of the magnitude, simplified step by step to 2π = 6.2832.