Observables and common eigenvectors

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of two observables represented by matrices A and B, specifically focusing on their eigenvalues, commutation relations, and the existence of common eigenvectors. The problem is situated within the context of linear algebra and quantum mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of eigenvalues for matrices A and B, noting degeneracies. There is an exploration of the implications of commuting observables on the existence of a complete basis of common eigenvectors, particularly in the context of degenerate eigenvalues.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants sharing their attempts to find eigenvectors and questioning the implications of their findings. Some guidance has been offered regarding linear combinations of eigenvectors and their potential to yield common eigenvectors for both matrices.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the clarity of the material provided and the implications of degeneracy on the completeness of the eigenvector basis. There is mention of lost previous work that could have informed the current discussion.

md.xavier
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In a given basis, the eigenvectors A and B are represented by the following matrices:

A = [ 1 0 0 ] B = [ 2 0 0 ]
[ 0 -1 0] [ 0 0 -2i ]
[ 0 0 -1] [ 0 2i 0 ]

What are A and B's eigenvalues?
Determine [A, B].
Obtain a set of eigenvectors common to A and B. Do they form a complete basis?

Homework Equations



(A - λI)x = 0
[A, B] = AB - BA

The Attempt at a Solution



Okay, so, I calculated the eigenvalues and the commutator quite easily.

For A, I got eigenvalues 1 and -1, with -1 having degeneracy 2.
For B, I got eigenvalues 2 and -2, with 2 having degeneracy 2.

The commutator was 0, so they commutate.

Now, as far as common eigenvectors go - I could only find one. [1 0 0] transposed.

Is this due to the eigenvalues having degeneracy? Does the fact that two observables commuting implies that they have a common complete basis of eigenvectors only hold up if they don't come from degenerate eigenvalues?

Thank you for your help -- the material given to me was not very clear regarding this particular case.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you tell us what you got for your three eigenvectors of B?
 
Last edited:
I did not get B's eigenvectors -- I got A's, the three unitary vectors, and applied B on them. Only one gave me an eigenvalue of B's (I got [2 0 0] transposed from applying B to [1 0 0] transposed). The others gave me stuff like [0 0 2i] transposed and [0 -2i 0] transposed, which are NOT eigenvectors of B since the remaining eigenvalues are -2 and 2.

I did do the exercise a few weeks ago by calculating B's eigenvectors and got the same conclusions -- I have sadly lost the sheet in which I did them.
 
You have found two eigenvectors of A that have the same eigenvalue of -1. Any linear combination of these two vectors will still be an eigenvector of A with eigenvalue -1, as you can easily show. See if you can find a particular linear combination that will also be an eigenvector of B with eigenvalue 2. Then find another linear combination that will be an eigenvector of B with eigenvalue -2.
 
I just did that. Considering a vector a = β*[0 1 0] + μ*[0 0 1], (both transposed) and applying B to it, I get the vector [0 -2μi 2βi] transposed.

Plugging in the eigenvalues and equalizing them, the only solution is μ and β equal to zero for both of them... so I'm at a loss.

Am I going about this the wrong way?
 
There are nonzero solutions for μ and β.

For example, suppose you want an eigenvector of B with eigenvalue 2. Then you need to find values of μ and β such that

B##\cdot##[0, β, μ]T = 2*[0, β, μ]T

or

[0, -2μi, 2βi] = [0, 2β, 2μ]
 
Oh. Thank you so much, I was messing up somewhere - I got exactly the same eigenvectors as I got for B. I probably should have gotten B's and compared them with A too.

Turns out they form a complete basis.

Thank you so much again!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
46
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K