I Observation of the effect of gravity on the motion of antimatter

hyksos
Messages
35
Reaction score
11
TL;DR Summary
A test performed on antihydrogen atoms has shown that gravity acts on matter and antimatter in a similar way. The experimental feat is the latest in efforts to probe the crossover between theories of relativity and particle physics.
The Alpha Experiment at CERN has finally produced a paper on whether antimatter falls towards the earth under gravity. The research confirms that antimatter acts identically to regular matter in regards to gravity.

Observation of the effect of gravity on the motion of antimatter. Anderson, E.K., Baker, C.J., Bertsche, W. et al. Nature 621, 716–722 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06527-1
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06527-1

The authors of this paper are concerned with a test of the Weak Equivalence Principle, which is great science. My personal interest in this work is a little bit different. A rumor has been circulating since at least the mid 1980s that antimatter can be interpreted as "regular matter moving backwards in time". This rumor was likely perpetuated by a popular book by Richard Feynman. My feeling is that is the results of this experiment should dispell that rumor in an ultimate and finalizing way. Dismissing the rumor via "it was never meant literally" is far weaker than strongly falsifying it experimentally -- which is what we have now.

Your thoughts?
 
  • Like
Likes Dale
Physics news on Phys.org
hyksos said:
A rumor has been circulating since at least the mid 1980s that antimatter can be interpreted as "regular matter moving backwards in time".
We don't discuss "rumors" here. I am not aware of any valid reference (textbook or peer-reviewed paper) that makes this claim. (Even Feynman in the popular book you reference did not make it as a claim about "reality"; he only put it forward as a mathematical trick to help with calculations.) Therefore, without any valid basis for discussion, I am closing this thread. If you can find a valid reference that makes the claim, PM me and we can reopen the thread to discuss it.
 
  • Like
Likes topsquark

Thread 'Is the variation of the metric ##\delta g_{\mu\nu}## a tensor?'

From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
View full post »

Thread 'I don't see how a black hole's event horizon can be crossed'

OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Antimatter falls down - with (0.75 ± 0.13 ± 0.16)g
Replies
23
Views
2K
I Two recent tests of loop quantum gravity theory
Replies
15
Views
5K
Which Papers Will Shape Future Quantum Gravity Research?
Replies
2
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top