Observing Naked Singularities: Implications for Quantum Gravity

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter windy miller
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Singularities
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The recent publication in Physical Review D discusses the potential observation of naked singularities, challenging existing theories of quantum gravity that typically eliminate singularities. The paper utilizes theoretical solutions comparing super-extremal and sub-extremal Kerr black holes. If naked singularities are indeed observable, it raises significant questions about the validity of quantum gravity theories that prohibit such phenomena. The analysis is limited to classical solutions, indicating that a quantum version of the super-extremal Kerr solution may still align with the paper's findings.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of general relativity and singularities
  • Familiarity with quantum gravity theories
  • Knowledge of Kerr black hole solutions
  • Basic comprehension of theoretical physics research methodologies
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of naked singularities in general relativity
  • Explore the differences between super-extremal and sub-extremal Kerr solutions
  • Investigate current theories of quantum gravity and their stance on singularities
  • Review the arXiv preprint of the discussed paper for detailed theoretical analysis
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, cosmologists, and researchers interested in the intersections of general relativity and quantum gravity, particularly those exploring the nature of singularities in the universe.

windy miller
Messages
306
Reaction score
28
A number of press outlets are reporting a new work that appears in Physical Review D that it might be possible to observe naked singularities.
See the story here:
http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/C..._most_extreme_object_in_the_universe_999.html
It got me thinking about quantum gravity. Some theories of quantum gravity ( perhaps all?) claim to remove singularities so if these observations were to be made, would that mean we would have to throw quantum gravity theories that forbid singularities?
 
Space news on Phys.org
The arxiv preprint of the paper is here (the published paper linked to in the spacedaily article is behind a paywall):

https://arxiv.org/abs/1611.08808

From a quick look, the paper appears to be using valid theoretical solutions (super-extremal Kerr vs. sub-extremal Kerr).

windy miller said:
Some theories of quantum gravity ( perhaps all?) claim to remove singularities so if these observations were to be made, would that mean we would have to throw quantum gravity theories that forbid singularities?

We can't tell without having the actual theories. There might be a quantum version of the super-extremal Kerr solution that still predicts the same observations as those deduced in the paper for a naked singularity in the classical version of the super-extremal Kerr solution. In other words, the paper's claim to be able to distinguish naked singularities from black holes only applies to the classical solutions, since those are the only ones the paper analyzed.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: windy miller

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K