MHB Odd Composite Property 1: A Unique Factorization Rule

  • Thread starter Thread starter yourskadhir
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Composite Property
yourskadhir
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi,

For any odd composite 'N', let u = (N-1)/2, v = u+1, then u^2(mod p) = v^2(mod p) if and only if 'p' is a factor of 'N'.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: Odd composite property1

suppose that:

$u^2 \equiv v^2\ (\text{mod }p)$

since $v = u+1$ this is the same as saying:

$0 \equiv 2u + 1\ (\text{mod }p)$

that is:

$2u + 1 = kp$ for some integer $k$.

recalling that $u = \frac{N-1}{2}$, we see that:

$2u + 1 = N = kp$, in which case $p$ divides (is a factor of) $N$.

on the other hand, suppose that $N = kp$.

then:

$u^2 = \frac{N^2 - 2N + 1}{4}$ while:

$v^2 = \left(\frac{N+1}{2}\right)^2 = \frac{N^2 + 2N + 1}{4}$

so:

$v^2 - u^2 = \frac{4N}{4} = N = kp$ thus:

$u^2 \equiv v^2\ (\text{mod }p)$

(it might be instructive to see why p cannot be 2).
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top