Odd or Even Power? Examining f(x)=x^n

  • Thread starter Thread starter thereddevils
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    even Power
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the classification of functions of the form f(x) = x^n, specifically when n takes on fractional values such as 3/2 and 1/2. Participants are examining whether these functions can be categorized as odd or even, and how their graphs behave compared to standard even and odd functions.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the nature of functions with fractional exponents, questioning the applicability of even and odd classifications. There is discussion about the graphical representation of these functions and how they differ from traditional parabolas and cubics.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the graphical characteristics of the functions in question, noting that certain fractional powers yield specific shapes, such as one-sided parabolas or semicubical parabolas. However, there is no explicit consensus on the classification of these functions as odd or even.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the need to restrict the domain of certain functions to achieve one-to-one behavior, which impacts their classification and graphical representation. There is also an acknowledgment that the classification may depend on the parity of the denominator in the exponent.

thereddevils
Messages
436
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I know for graphs of function f(x)=x^n where n is an odd power, even power or square root have their own pattern but how about

f(x)=x^(3/2)

or f(x)=x^(1/2)

is that considered odd or even ?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, 3/2 and 1/2 are neither even or odd. There isn't exactly a simple rule for f(x) = x^(3/2), but it is a famous curve called http://mathworld.wolfram.com/SemicubicalParabola.html"

You can think of f(x) = x^(1/2) as a parabola tipped on its side, and then the bottom half is chopped off so that it's a function.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Gib Z said:
No, 3/2 and 1/2 are neither even or odd. There isn't exactly a simple rule for f(x) = x^(3/2), but it is a famous curve called http://mathworld.wolfram.com/SemicubicalParabola.html"

You can think of f(x) = x^(1/2) as a parabola tipped on its side, and then the bottom half is chopped off so that it's a function.

thanks, i have tried graphing several such graphs with a program and notice something.

Any function f(x)=x^n , where n is 1/2, 1/3 (the denominator can be any real and the numerator is 1), the graph will look like a one-sided parabola opening to the right

And if n=3/2, 5/2, 7/3 (any rational numbers aside from case 1)

the graph will look like a semicubical parabola.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
thereddevils said:
thanks, i have tried graphing several such graphs with a program and notice something.

Any function f(x)=x^n , where n is 1/2, 1/3 (the denominator can be any real and the numerator is 1), the graph will look like a one-sided parabola opening to the right
Err, not quite. The graph of [tex]f(x) = x^{1/3}[/tex] does NOT look like a one-sided parabola opening to the right.

The function [tex]f(x) = x^{2}[/tex] is a parabola, but it is not one-to-one. If we restrict the domain of f(x) to [0, ∞), then f(x) would be one-to-one and the inverse would be [tex]f^{-1}(x) = x^{1/2} = \sqrt{x}[/tex]. So the graph of [tex]f^{-1}(x)[/tex] would be a half-of-a-parabola laying on its side.

Now, the function [tex]g(x) = x^{3}[/tex], your basic cubic, IS one-to-one, so we don't need to restrict the domain. It's inverse would be [tex]g^{-1}(x) = x^{1/3} = \sqrt[3]{x}[/tex], and its graph would look like the COMPLETE graph of [tex]g(x) = x^{3}[/tex], but rotated to the side and flipped, for a lack of a better desciption.69
 
eumyang said:
Err, not quite. The graph of [tex]f(x) = x^{1/3}[/tex] does NOT look like a one-sided parabola opening to the right.

The function [tex]f(x) = x^{2}[/tex] is a parabola, but it is not one-to-one. If we restrict the domain of f(x) to [0, ∞), then f(x) would be one-to-one and the inverse would be [tex]f^{-1}(x) = x^{1/2} = \sqrt{x}[/tex]. So the graph of [tex]f^{-1}(x)[/tex] would be a half-of-a-parabola laying on its side.

Now, the function [tex]g(x) = x^{3}[/tex], your basic cubic, IS one-to-one, so we don't need to restrict the domain. It's inverse would be [tex]g^{-1}(x) = x^{1/3} = \sqrt[3]{x}[/tex], and its graph would look like the COMPLETE graph of [tex]g(x) = x^{3}[/tex], but rotated to the side and flipped, for a lack of a better desciption.


69

yeah that's only when the denominator is odd. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
Replies
9
Views
3K