Odd or Even Power? Examining f(x)=x^n

  • Thread starter Thread starter thereddevils
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    even Power
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
4 replies · 3K views
thereddevils
Messages
436
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I know for graphs of function f(x)=x^n where n is an odd power, even power or square root have their own pattern but how about

f(x)=x^(3/2)

or f(x)=x^(1/2)

is that considered odd or even ?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, 3/2 and 1/2 are neither even or odd. There isn't exactly a simple rule for f(x) = x^(3/2), but it is a famous curve called http://mathworld.wolfram.com/SemicubicalParabola.html"

You can think of f(x) = x^(1/2) as a parabola tipped on its side, and then the bottom half is chopped off so that it's a function.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Gib Z said:
No, 3/2 and 1/2 are neither even or odd. There isn't exactly a simple rule for f(x) = x^(3/2), but it is a famous curve called http://mathworld.wolfram.com/SemicubicalParabola.html"

You can think of f(x) = x^(1/2) as a parabola tipped on its side, and then the bottom half is chopped off so that it's a function.

thanks, i have tried graphing several such graphs with a program and notice something.

Any function f(x)=x^n , where n is 1/2, 1/3 (the denominator can be any real and the numerator is 1), the graph will look like a one-sided parabola opening to the right

And if n=3/2, 5/2, 7/3 (any rational numbers aside from case 1)

the graph will look like a semicubical parabola.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
thereddevils said:
thanks, i have tried graphing several such graphs with a program and notice something.

Any function f(x)=x^n , where n is 1/2, 1/3 (the denominator can be any real and the numerator is 1), the graph will look like a one-sided parabola opening to the right
Err, not quite. The graph of [tex]f(x) = x^{1/3}[/tex] does NOT look like a one-sided parabola opening to the right.

The function [tex]f(x) = x^{2}[/tex] is a parabola, but it is not one-to-one. If we restrict the domain of f(x) to [0, ∞), then f(x) would be one-to-one and the inverse would be [tex]f^{-1}(x) = x^{1/2} = \sqrt{x}[/tex]. So the graph of [tex]f^{-1}(x)[/tex] would be a half-of-a-parabola laying on its side.

Now, the function [tex]g(x) = x^{3}[/tex], your basic cubic, IS one-to-one, so we don't need to restrict the domain. It's inverse would be [tex]g^{-1}(x) = x^{1/3} = \sqrt[3]{x}[/tex], and its graph would look like the COMPLETE graph of [tex]g(x) = x^{3}[/tex], but rotated to the side and flipped, for a lack of a better desciption.69
 
eumyang said:
Err, not quite. The graph of [tex]f(x) = x^{1/3}[/tex] does NOT look like a one-sided parabola opening to the right.

The function [tex]f(x) = x^{2}[/tex] is a parabola, but it is not one-to-one. If we restrict the domain of f(x) to [0, ∞), then f(x) would be one-to-one and the inverse would be [tex]f^{-1}(x) = x^{1/2} = \sqrt{x}[/tex]. So the graph of [tex]f^{-1}(x)[/tex] would be a half-of-a-parabola laying on its side.

Now, the function [tex]g(x) = x^{3}[/tex], your basic cubic, IS one-to-one, so we don't need to restrict the domain. It's inverse would be [tex]g^{-1}(x) = x^{1/3} = \sqrt[3]{x}[/tex], and its graph would look like the COMPLETE graph of [tex]g(x) = x^{3}[/tex], but rotated to the side and flipped, for a lack of a better desciption.


69

yeah that's only when the denominator is odd. Thanks.