MHB Odds of being correct if choosing a question at random

  • Thread starter Thread starter alexmahone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Random
AI Thread Summary
Choosing an answer to the question at random presents a paradox regarding the probabilities of correctness. If the answer is 25%, it leads to a contradiction by suggesting a 50% chance of selection. Similarly, assuming the answer is 50% or 60% also results in contradictions. The only consistent outcome arises when considering an answer outside the given options, which yields a 0% chance of being correct. Ultimately, the self-referential nature of the question renders it logically invalid.
alexmahone
Messages
303
Reaction score
0
If you choose an answer to this question at random, what is the chance you will be correct.

a. 25%

b.50%

c.60%

d.25%

My answer:
1/3*1/2 + 1/3*1/4 + 1/3*1/4 = 1/6 + 1/6 = 1/3
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I have no idea how the given answer is reached.

Suppose the answer is 25%. You will choose that 50% of the time, so the answer is 50%, a contradiction.
Suppose the answer is 50%. You will choose that 25% of the time, so the answer is 25%, a contradiction.
Suppose the answer is 60%. You will choose that 25% of the time, so the answer is 25%, a contradiction.
Suppose the answer is some other value. You will choose that 0% of the time, so the answer is 0%, a consistent result.

But the existence of a consistent result doesn’t make the question "well posed". The self reference makes it logically invalid in the same way that "this statement is false" is invalid.
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Back
Top