MHB Odds of being correct if choosing a question at random

  • Thread starter Thread starter alexmahone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Random
alexmahone
Messages
303
Reaction score
0
If you choose an answer to this question at random, what is the chance you will be correct.

a. 25%

b.50%

c.60%

d.25%

My answer:
1/3*1/2 + 1/3*1/4 + 1/3*1/4 = 1/6 + 1/6 = 1/3
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I have no idea how the given answer is reached.

Suppose the answer is 25%. You will choose that 50% of the time, so the answer is 50%, a contradiction.
Suppose the answer is 50%. You will choose that 25% of the time, so the answer is 25%, a contradiction.
Suppose the answer is 60%. You will choose that 25% of the time, so the answer is 25%, a contradiction.
Suppose the answer is some other value. You will choose that 0% of the time, so the answer is 0%, a consistent result.

But the existence of a consistent result doesn’t make the question "well posed". The self reference makes it logically invalid in the same way that "this statement is false" is invalid.
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top