A Off-Forward quark-quark amplitude in momentum space

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the challenge of expressing the quark-quark amplitude in momentum space using light-cone coordinates. The user attempts to write the amplitude using a specific integral involving the quark field operator and its momentum representation. Initial feedback indicates that the approach appears correct, suggesting the next step is to substitute the definition of the quark field and evaluate the integral. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly transitioning from position to momentum space in quantum field theory. Overall, the user is seeking validation and guidance on their methodology.
Diracobama2181
Messages
70
Reaction score
3
TL;DR
I am attempting to find the off-forward quark-quark amplitude in momentum space.
I am having difficulty writing out

##\bra{p',\lambda}\psi^{\dagger}(-\frac{z^-}{2})\gamma^0\gamma^+\psi\frac{z^-}{2})\ket{p,\lambda}## in momentum space.
Here, I am working in light-cone coordinates, where I am defining ##z^-=z^0-z^3##, ##r'=r=(0,z^{-},z^1,z^2)##.
My attempt at this would be
$$\bra{p',\lambda}\psi^{\dagger}(-\frac{z^{-}}{2})\gamma^0\gamma^{+}\psi\frac{z^{-}}{2})\ket{p,\lambda}=\Sigma_{r,r'}\bra{p',\lambda}(\ket{r'}\bra{r'})\psi^{\dagger}(-\frac{z^{-}}{2})\gamma^0\gamma^{+}\psi\frac{z^{-}}{2}(\ket{r}\bra{r})\ket{p,\lambda}\\\\
=\int d^3r exp[i(p'-p)\cdot z^{-}]\psi^{\dagger}(-\frac{z^-}{2})\gamma^0\gamma^+\psi(\frac{z^-}{2})$$.
From here, I can substitute in
##\psi(t,\vec{r})=\int\frac{d^3\vec{k}}{(2\pi)^3}exp[-i(k^0t-\vec{k}\cdot \vec{r})]\phi(\vec{k})##

Is this attempt correct so far, or am I overlooking something? Any comments are appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your attempt looks correct so far. The next step would be to substitute in the definition of ##\psi## and evaluate the integral. This should give you a result in momentum space.
 
For the quantum state ##|l,m\rangle= |2,0\rangle## the z-component of angular momentum is zero and ##|L^2|=6 \hbar^2##. According to uncertainty it is impossible to determine the values of ##L_x, L_y, L_z## simultaneously. However, we know that ##L_x## and ## L_y##, like ##L_z##, get the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. In other words, for the state ##|2,0\rangle## we have ##\vec{L}=(L_x, L_y,0)## with ##L_x## and ## L_y## one of the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. But none of these...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
59
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K