On charges in a bounded region which moves:

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter elegysix
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bounded Charges
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of charges on a conducting plate, particularly when the plate is in motion. Participants explore concepts related to charge distribution, the effects of magnetic fields, and the implications of special relativity on these phenomena. The conversation includes theoretical considerations and challenges related to the nature of conductors versus insulators.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that two equal charges on a conducting plate would repel each other and likely reside at the edge of the plate, especially when the plate is in motion.
  • Another participant asserts that charges cannot remain isolated on a conducting plate and will instead spread out to maintain an equipotential surface.
  • A participant questions the concept of equipotential surfaces in the context of discrete charges, seeking clarification on whether discrete points of charge can exist on a conductor.
  • There is a proposal to consider the scenario of an insulator where charges are fixed at specific points, questioning if magnetic fields from moving charges would exert forces on each other.
  • One participant emphasizes the need for understanding special relativity when discussing the electric and magnetic fields of moving charges.
  • Another participant introduces the idea that charge distribution on a conducting plate can be influenced by the surrounding environment and the speed of electrical signals in empty space.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the behavior of charges on conductors versus insulators, the nature of equipotential surfaces, and the relevance of special relativity. No consensus is reached regarding the correct interpretation of these concepts.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of calculating surface charge distributions and the challenges of applying Lorentz transformations in this context. The discussion reflects uncertainties about the implications of charge behavior in different materials and conditions.

elegysix
Messages
404
Reaction score
15
So I asked my professor this question the other day, but I didn't get a clear answer. He said something about the fields being relative to each other, and so they didn't interact. Anyways, here is the setup:

Suppose we have a circular conducting plate of some radius, and on this plate there are two free charges with the same value of charge, (q1=q2). Where then, would the charges be? because the charges repel each other, it is a fair guess that they would be on the edge of the plate, where the distance between them is greatest. Suppose then, that the plate is moving with a constant velocity. Where would the charges be then?

My guess is that because each moving charge creates a magnetic field, the force of one charge's magnetic field on the other charge is q(VXB) which always points inward toward the axis the plate moves along. Perhaps a clearer explanation: As the plate moves along an axis, one charge lies along the leading edge of the plate, and the other along the trailing end of the plate, and a line between the two charges coincides with the axis the plate moves along. I've drawn a picture if it helps.

physprob.jpg



Is this correct? as I mentioned at first, I didn't get a clear answer from my professor. He said something about relative fields and them not interacting, but I couldn't follow what he was saying. Any thoughts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. You cannot keep charge on a conducting plate isolated as in your picture. Charge will spread out over the surface of the plate to keep the conductor as an equipotential.

2. If you calculate the surface charge distribution for the conductor at rest, the charge-current distribution on a moving conductor is most easily found by Lorentz transforming the rest frame charge distribution as part of a four-vector in special relativity. It is much more difficult to find the distributions working only in the moving frame.

Both of your pictures are wrong.
 
I don't understand what you mean by "charge will spread out... to keep the conductor as an equipotential." I cannot think of how the surface could ever possibly be equipotential if there are discrete points of charge like an electron... or are you suggesting this is not the case, that I can't have discrete points of charge?

perhaps you wouldn't mind explaining a little more? I'm relatively new to lorentz transforms, special relativity, and have no idea how to calculate a surface charge distribution.
 
elegysix said:
I cannot think of how the surface could ever possibly be equipotential if there are discrete points of charge like an electron... or are you suggesting this is not the case, that I can't have discrete points of charge?
You can't have discrete points of charge on a conductor.
Don't worry about Lorentz transformations yet. Try to understand conductors.
Finding the surface charge distribution on a conducting plate is a hard enough problem.
Wait until you learn more EM.
 
Interesting concept. Well suppose we say it is not a conducting plate, but an insulator, in which the charges are bound to those two specific points, is that plausible? If so, then is it valid to say the magnetic field from one particle causes a force on the other and vice versa?
 
To some extent. The E and B fields of a moving charge requires special relativity.
That is why Einstein titled his paper "The electrodynamics of moving bodies".
Wait until you have a good course including relativity, before answering this.
 
Clem is correct. The charges are everywhere at the same time** (the charge density is minimized). Let's not worry about the indivisibility of the electrons here. It is uesful to consider the conducting plate in an environment where all of the two charges' field lines terminate on negative charges someplace out of sight. The charge is probably half on each side of the plate.

**This because the plate is part of an electric circuit, and surrounded by empty space. The velocity of electrical signals in empty space is v = 1/sqrt(u0e0) = c, where u0 and e0 are the permeability and permittivity of empty space. So the charges distribute at the speed of light.

Bob S
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
488
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K