Does a Railgun's Current Violate Conservation of Momentum?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the mechanics of railguns and the implications of conservation of momentum when a current flows through a rigid arrangement of wires and capacitor plates. Participants explore the Lorentz force acting on a projectile and the potential recoil of the railgun system. Key points include the role of displacement current and back EMF in maintaining momentum conservation, as well as the assertion that the rigid structure does not accelerate without external forces. The conversation concludes that the recoil effect, akin to that of a gun, must be considered even in an idealized scenario.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lorentz force and its application in electromagnetic systems
  • Familiarity with displacement current and its role in electromagnetic theory
  • Knowledge of Newton's laws, particularly the third law of motion
  • Basic principles of railgun operation and electromagnetic propulsion
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of Lenz's Law in electromagnetic systems
  • Study the concept of back EMF and its effects on circuit dynamics
  • Explore the relationship between electromagnetic fields and momentum conservation
  • Investigate advanced railgun designs and their efficiency in projectile acceleration
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, electrical engineers, and students interested in electromagnetism, as well as enthusiasts of railgun technology and its underlying principles.

  • #61
alan123hk said:
Thank you for introducing this useful and informative calculation process.

However, I noticed that doing this experiment can be very difficult and expensive.
Agreed, my idealized device is hardly practical. So let's make a more realistic example by increasing the total mass and storing energy in a commercial capacitor. For example, on Amazon you can find this ##1\text{ gm}## Torong HV ceramic chip capacitor:
1700094903459.png

characterized by ##C=10\text{ nF},V=30\text{ kV}##. Coupling this to a lightweight antenna structure, we could perhaps put together a device of, say, ##M=50\text{ gm}## total. Energy-momentum conservation then yields:$$E_{\text{rad}}\approx E_{\text{cap}}=4.5\text{ J},\:Mc^{2}=4.5\times10^{15}\text{ J},\:v=300\text{ nm/s},\:\frac{1}{2}Mv^{2}=2.25\times10^{-15}\text{ J}$$So the recoil speed ##v## is only on the order of hundreds of nanometers per second, and this is an upper limit due to resistive losses and the reduced directivity of a real antenna. Nevertheless, I can imagine that a sensitive lab experiment in vacuum might be able to detect the motion.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: alan123hk
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
renormalize said:
So the speed v is only on the order of hundreds of nanometers per second, and this is an upper limit due to resistive losses and the reduced directivity of a real antenna. Nevertheless, I can imagine that a sensitive lab experiment in vacuum might be able to detect the motion.
Agree that this movement should be detectable with advanced scientific instruments.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K