I Does a Railgun's Current Violate Conservation of Momentum?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on whether a railgun's operation violates conservation of momentum. Participants explore the mechanics of a railgun setup, where a charged capacitor induces a current that generates a magnetic field and Lorentz force, propelling a projectile. Concerns arise about how the system can recoil without an apparent third law partner for the forces involved, leading to questions about displacement currents and back EMF. The conversation emphasizes that while the projectile accelerates, the system must also account for recoil forces, which are linked to the conservation of momentum. Ultimately, the discussion highlights the complexities of electromagnetic interactions and their implications for fundamental physics principles.
  • #61
alan123hk said:
Thank you for introducing this useful and informative calculation process.

However, I noticed that doing this experiment can be very difficult and expensive.
Agreed, my idealized device is hardly practical. So let's make a more realistic example by increasing the total mass and storing energy in a commercial capacitor. For example, on Amazon you can find this ##1\text{ gm}## Torong HV ceramic chip capacitor:
1700094903459.png

characterized by ##C=10\text{ nF},V=30\text{ kV}##. Coupling this to a lightweight antenna structure, we could perhaps put together a device of, say, ##M=50\text{ gm}## total. Energy-momentum conservation then yields:$$E_{\text{rad}}\approx E_{\text{cap}}=4.5\text{ J},\:Mc^{2}=4.5\times10^{15}\text{ J},\:v=300\text{ nm/s},\:\frac{1}{2}Mv^{2}=2.25\times10^{-15}\text{ J}$$So the recoil speed ##v## is only on the order of hundreds of nanometers per second, and this is an upper limit due to resistive losses and the reduced directivity of a real antenna. Nevertheless, I can imagine that a sensitive lab experiment in vacuum might be able to detect the motion.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
renormalize said:
So the speed v is only on the order of hundreds of nanometers per second, and this is an upper limit due to resistive losses and the reduced directivity of a real antenna. Nevertheless, I can imagine that a sensitive lab experiment in vacuum might be able to detect the motion.
Agree that this movement should be detectable with advanced scientific instruments.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
303
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K