On commuting of position and momentum operators

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
4 replies · 2K views
dingo_d
Messages
199
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have to proove:

[tex][\hat{y},\hat{p}_y]=[\hat{z},\hat{p}_z]=i\hbar\hat{I}[/tex]


Homework Equations



[tex][\hat{A},\hat{B}]=\hat{A}\hat{B}-\hat{B}\hat{A}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



Ok so I know that

[tex][\hat{y},\hat{p}_y]=\hat{y}\hat{p}_y-\hat{p}_y\hat{y}=y\left(-i\hbar\frac{\partial}{\partial y}\right)-(-i\hbar\frac{\partial y}{\partial y})=i\hbar[/tex]

Analogus for z component. But how to show that it's [tex]i\hbar\hat{I}[/tex]?

Since they're operators they can be expressed in component form - they correspond to some kind of matrix, right?

I don't see how to get that [tex]\hat{I}[/tex] :\
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A few hints:

1. Remember that [,] is an operator and thus it should act on an arbitrary function, in QM its the wave function.

2. Remember that (d/dy)y f= f+ydf/dy (why?).
 
Ok so I can set a wave function [tex]\psi (x)[/tex] and say: [tex]\psi (x)=\langle x|\psi\rangle[/tex]. And I can use product rule.

So [tex][\hat{y},\hat{p}_y]\psi(x)=i\hbar\psi(x)[/tex], but how to relate that with identity operator? :\ I mean, acting with identity operator won't change my wave function...
 
dingo_d said:
Ok so I can set a wave function [tex]\psi (x)[/tex] and say: [tex]\psi (x)=\langle x|\psi\rangle[/tex]. And I can use product rule.

So [tex][\hat{y},\hat{p}_y]\psi(x)=i\hbar\psi(x)[/tex], but how to relate that with identity operator? :\ I mean, acting with identity operator won't change my wave function...

When you write

[tex][\hat{y},\hat{p}_y]\psi(x)=i\hbar\psi(x)[/tex]

that makes mathematical sense because the left and right-hand sides are both wavefunctions. If we want to write

[tex][\hat{y},\hat{p}_y]=?[/tex]

we have an operator on the left-hand side, so we should have an operator on the right-hand side. Since you already derived the result for the first equation, just note that it is equivalent to

[tex][\hat{y},\hat{p}_y]\psi(x)=i\hbar \hat{I}\psi(x)[/tex]

and you will have the correct value for the operator statement.
 
I see, it's like when I have [tex]\vec{F}=m\vec{a}[/tex] - if I have a vector on the one side I must have vector on the other side...

(we said sth about it on my group theory class, but as a side note...)