On the nature of vacuum and questions thereof

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Lensmonkey
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nature Vacuum
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the mechanics of vacuum and atmospheric pressure using a syringe analogy. It establishes that the force required to lift a plunger in a vacuum tube equals the weight of the air column above it, leading to a plateau in force once this weight is matched. However, the energy input continues to increase as the plunger is pulled further. The conversation also highlights that in space, where there is no air pressure, suction does not exist, and atmospheric pressure can be utilized as a variable spring in atmospheric clocks.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts such as force, pressure, and vacuum.
  • Familiarity with the mechanics of syringes and vacuum systems.
  • Knowledge of atmospheric pressure and its effects on physical systems.
  • Basic principles of energy and work in physics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the principles of vacuum mechanics in more detail.
  • Research the design and operation of atmospheric clocks.
  • Learn about the physics of pressure differentials in various environments.
  • Investigate the applications of vacuum systems in engineering and science.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, engineering, and atmospheric sciences, as well as anyone interested in the principles of vacuum and pressure dynamics.

Lensmonkey
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
i have been pondering something. this is it: if a fellow had a tube with a plunger in it, like a syringe but without an opening for a needle or such. say the plunger is at the bottom of the tube. If you start to pull/raise it, it is my understanding that the force required to lift it would be equal to the weight of the column of air in the atmosphere described by the area of the plunger's cross section. Would this mean then that after that force had been met that then the energy needed would plateau? Say you go to pick up a 50 lb weight, you strain until it is lifted but then it does not get any harder. Is this the same with vacuum? Another thing: I you are in space, since here are no forces on either side of the previously mentioned tube-and-plunger, would suction exist?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Once the force of the air pressure pushing down on the "plunger" is equal to the force you are lifting with, velocity will be constant as long as you can continue to apply that force.

In space, there is no air pressure, so no suction would exist.
 
Lensmonkey said:
i have been pondering something. this is it: if a fellow had a tube with a plunger in it, like a syringe but without an opening for a needle or such. say the plunger is at the bottom of the tube. If you start to pull/raise it, it is my understanding that the force required to lift it would be equal to the weight of the column of air in the atmosphere described by the area of the plunger's cross section. Would this mean then that after that force had been met that then the energy needed would plateau?

The force needed to pull a plunger with a vacuum does indeed plateau. Given a syringe this is fairly easy to do. You can pull a vacuum in a small syringe with little difficulty.

That's not the same as saying that there is a plateau in energy. The farther you pull against a fixed force, the more work you perform and so the more energy you are putting into the system.
 
hmm. I have tried this quickly and i was only able to pull the syringe a pretty short distance. (need to work out i guess!) but it made me wonder whether i was missing something. However, If the amount of force becomes a constant after the weight of atmosphere is equaled, this might make a good clock spring right?
 
Lensmonkey said:
hmm. I have tried this quickly and i was only able to pull the syringe a pretty short distance. (need to work out i guess!) but it made me wonder whether i was missing something. However, If the amount of force becomes a constant after the weight of atmosphere is equaled, this might make a good clock spring right?
The force does not become a constant it varies with air pressure.
 
ah rats, you're right.
 
Lensmonkey said:
ah rats, you're right.

The atmosphere can still be used as spring because of it variability and a pretty good one, atmospheric clocks run mainly on the variation of the atmospheres pressure and don't need winding for years.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atmos_clock
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
6K
  • · Replies 99 ·
4
Replies
99
Views
11K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
11K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K