- #1
- 6
- 0
Hey I was reading Susanna Discrete book and I came across her definition of One-to-One function:
Let F be a function from a set X to a set Y. F is one-to-one (or injective) if, and only if, for all elements x1 and x2 in X,
if F(x1 ) = F(x2 ),then x1 = x2 ,
or, equivalently, if x1 ≠ x2 ,then F(x1) ≠ F(x2).
Symbolically,
F: X → Y is one-to-one ⇔ ∀x 1 ,x 2 ∈ X,if F(x1 ) = F(x2 ) then x1 = x2.
But I am not sure if I fully understand the definition. Here is my interpretation of the definition:
A function is said to be one-to-one if and only if,
if f(x1) and f(x2) are the same then x1=x2 ,
e.g if f(x1)=f(x2)=3, then
x1 = x2 = 1
Since, the co-domain 3 is being pointed by a two non-distinctive domain 1 then it said to be a one-to-one function.
Let F be a function from a set X to a set Y. F is one-to-one (or injective) if, and only if, for all elements x1 and x2 in X,
if F(x1 ) = F(x2 ),then x1 = x2 ,
or, equivalently, if x1 ≠ x2 ,then F(x1) ≠ F(x2).
Symbolically,
F: X → Y is one-to-one ⇔ ∀x 1 ,x 2 ∈ X,if F(x1 ) = F(x2 ) then x1 = x2.
But I am not sure if I fully understand the definition. Here is my interpretation of the definition:
A function is said to be one-to-one if and only if,
if f(x1) and f(x2) are the same then x1=x2 ,
e.g if f(x1)=f(x2)=3, then
x1 = x2 = 1
Since, the co-domain 3 is being pointed by a two non-distinctive domain 1 then it said to be a one-to-one function.
Last edited: