Open Courseware, Youtube, and other resources

  • Context: Courses 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Illuminerdi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Resources Youtube
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion emphasizes the need for organizing online educational resources, particularly YouTube lecture series that cover entire undergraduate curricula in engineering, science, and math. Key institutions mentioned include MIT, Berkeley, Stanford, NPTEL, and Khan Academy, with a consensus that while videos are effective for demonstration, textbooks remain crucial for in-depth learning. Participants advocate for compiling lists of core curricula and textbooks, as well as establishing online study groups and self-testing mechanisms to enhance learning outcomes.

PREREQUISITES
  • Familiarity with online learning platforms such as YouTube and Khan Academy
  • Understanding of undergraduate curricula in engineering, science, and math
  • Basic knowledge of self-study techniques and online collaboration tools
  • Awareness of educational resources like MIT OpenCourseWare and NPTEL
NEXT STEPS
  • Compile a comprehensive list of YouTube lecture series for various undergraduate disciplines
  • Research effective online study group platforms for collaborative learning
  • Explore self-testing tools and methods for skill validation
  • Investigate ways to integrate textbooks with video resources for a holistic learning experience
USEFUL FOR

Students, educators, and lifelong learners seeking to optimize their study methods through a combination of video lectures and textbooks, as well as those interested in creating structured online learning communities.

Illuminerdi
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Hey, it seems there's an abundance of valuable learning resources online, especially on youtube, but, it's not always organized as well as it could be. I think we should compile lists of youtube lecture series that span entire undergraduate curricula for all sorts of engineering, science, and math majors.

I know there's MIT, Berkeley, Stanford, Nptelhrd, KhanAcademy/PatrickJMT, UNSW, and a few obscure video series if you dig hard enough (especially on Youtube.com/edu). Some videos are a bit better than others—Khan Academy is probably the most effective at teaching, MIT videos are better in quality than Nptelhrd videos, even though the selection is fewer.

So, let's start by getting lists of the core curricula for given disciplines. Who's with me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'd say that arranging a list of textbooks would be better, textbooks are, for me at least, a better tool for learning..
 
genericusrnme said:
I'd say that arranging a list of textbooks would be better, textbooks are, for me at least, a better tool for learning..

I think you might be unique. I've found that people tend to learn best from demonstration and I think this is how most people innately are, or at least how it has seemed from my experiences in electrical engineering. Nonetheless, if you learn from books, presumably there are others who learn from books, and we should try to have the best resources accessible to every type of learner.
 
Illuminerdi said:
I think you might be unique. I've found that people tend to learn best from demonstration and I think this is how most people innately are, or at least how it has seemed from my experiences in electrical engineering.

I don't think he is. Personally, the reason I think most people learn better from videos is because they might not be as motivated to learn the stuff, whereas those who're truly motivated to learn will find that they learn much quicker by using a 'denser' source (aka a book). While I like watching videos to get a gentle introduction into a subject, I find that I'm more efficient when reading a book. (So which source I use depends on where I am on the relaxing-while-doing-something-useful/hardcore-learning continuum.) Also, it's quite possible to demonstrate something in a book, it just requires you to use more mental resources. :wink: Then again, for others, which source makes you learn 'best' may not have much to do with motivation after all.
 
http://www.infoocean.info/avatar1.jpg I'd say that arranging a list of textbooks would be better.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Illuminerdi said:
Hey, it seems there's an abundance of valuable learning resources online, especially on youtube, but, it's not always organized as well as it could be. I think we should compile lists of youtube lecture series that span entire undergraduate curricula for all sorts of engineering, science, and math majors.

Yup. That the next step. The other things that would be useful are:

1) some sort of online study group that you can use to discuss the videos
2) some sort of method of self-testing and then the ability to provide that you have skill X so that you can convert skills into cash
3) some sort of mechanism by which you can get advice on general undergraduate things
4) some way of doing lab work

So, let's start by getting lists of the core curricula for given disciplines. Who's with me?

http://mitx.mit.edu/

This sort of things makes sense to do on a wiki. wikiversity has some space that isn't being used.

The other thing is that I'm convinced that some time in the next decade someone somewhere, will get the equvalent of an undergraduate physics degree though self-study.
 
It's not either/or. I think the goal is to combine all forms of communication into an *experience* that teachs physics. How do you combine books with videos with facebook with youtube with google with things that haven't been invented yet.
 
As much as I think textbooks are a MUCH better source of information, check out this thread for some other lectures:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=554150
If we want to start some sort of compilation project, we should do both lectures and books. There is really no harm in including books, especially there are not too many lectures on upper level science in general.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
16K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
31K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
90K