Open subspace of a compact space topological space

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

In topology, it is established that while closed subspaces of a compact space are compact, open subspaces are not necessarily compact. The discussion highlights a proof attempt that incorrectly assumes an open subspace G of a compact space X is compact by using the relative topology. A counterexample provided is the open interval (0,1) within the compact space [0,1], demonstrating that an open cover of G may not have a finite subcover, thus invalidating the proof.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of compact spaces in topology
  • Familiarity with open and closed sets
  • Knowledge of the concept of open covers and finite subcovers
  • Basic principles of relative topology
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of compact spaces in topology
  • Learn about the differences between open and closed sets in topological spaces
  • Explore the concept of open covers and the importance of finite subcovers
  • Examine counterexamples in topology to solidify understanding of compactness
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of topology, and anyone interested in understanding the properties of compact spaces and their subspaces.

de_brook
Messages
74
Reaction score
0
It is a fact that if X is a compact topoloical space then a closed subspace of X is compact.
Is an open subspace G of X also compact?
please consider the following and note if i am wrong;

proof: Since G is open then the relative topology on G is class {H_i}of open subset of X such that the union of all sets in this class is G. but X is compact and each H_i is the intersection of G with an open subset P_i of X for corresponding i. The result follows from the fact {p_i} has a finite subclass which contains X.
hence every open subspace of a compact space is compact.

pls, am i right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your proof is wrong, as you can have an open cover of G in the topology of X that doesn't cover X, and then when you reduce it to the induced topology on G it doesn't need to have a finite subcover.

Conclusion: All you did is prove that an open cover of a compact space is also an open cover of its subsets (not a very impressive result :p )

As a quick counterexample, see (0,1) contained in [0,1]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
561
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K