Optimizing Seating Arrangements: Maximizing Capacity and Minimizing Tables

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter MarkFL
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around optimizing seating arrangements using smaller square tables to form larger tables, focusing on maximizing the number of people seated while minimizing the number of tables used. The scope includes theoretical exploration and mathematical reasoning related to seating configurations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express uncertainty about the phrase "as square as possible," suggesting it lacks clarity.
  • One participant describes an algorithm for forming larger tables, noting that while there are multiple approaches, theirs is straightforward.
  • Another participant observes that there seems to be no general formula for determining the number of people that can be seated based on table placement, indicating that the arrangement affects seating capacity.
  • A pattern is proposed regarding the transition from square to rectangular arrangements, with assumptions about the relationship between the number of units added and the resulting shape.
  • A mathematical expression is presented that attempts to define the number of seats based on the configuration of tables, with conditions based on the number of tables and their arrangement.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not appear to reach a consensus on the optimal arrangements or formulas, with multiple competing views and uncertainties remaining regarding the best approach to the problem.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the vagueness of the term "as square as possible," the lack of a general formula for seating capacity, and the dependence on specific arrangements of tables that may not be predetermined.

MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
We wish to find how many people can be seated around a table. We may form larger tables by pushing together smaller square tables and arranging people as shown in the diagram:

View attachment 1261

There are two rules we are required to follow when pushing the smaller tables together and arranging the people around the larger table:
  • Only 1 person may be seated at one side of a smaller table
  • The larger table must be made as square as possible

Determine:

a) The number of people that may be seated for a given number of smaller tables.

b) The minimum number of smaller tables required to seat a given number of people.
 

Attachments

  • peopletables.jpg
    peopletables.jpg
    5.4 KB · Views: 121
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The statement '' as square as possible '' is a little bit vague !
 
This is the "algorithm" I used for forming the larger tables:

View attachment 1264

While there are other ways to go about it to get the same results, to me this is the most straightforward way to approach the problem.
 

Attachments

  • tablegrid.jpg
    tablegrid.jpg
    26.7 KB · Views: 110
For a), it seems like there is no general formula for the number of people. If a table is placed in a "corner", the number of people stays the same. Otherwise, it increases by two. It's hard to tell where a table is going to be placed in advance.
b) only works if the number of people is even. But there also seems to be no formula.
 
It seems like a pattern on creating the tables , we start by ,say, a square then we add 1 square so it becomes a rectangle then we add two units it becomes a square then adding two units it becomes a rectangle adding now three units it becomes a square again and so on .

So Assume that We start by a square we add a number of units equal to its length that transfers it to a rectangle with a parameter in terms of the length of the square .

So nice structure .

Mark , what algorithm did you use ?
 
ZaidAlyafey said:
...
Mark , what algorithm did you use ?

I will be posting my solutions soon, but I want to give everyone a chance first...(Tongueout)
 
If the complete table is square with side k, you have 4k seats.

With fewer tables this does not change, until you get a rectangle of k x (k-1) tables.
Then you get 2 places fewer.

With 1 table more than k x k, you get 2 extra places, which again doesn't change until you have k x (k+1) tables.

Therefore:
$$\text{seats}(n)=\begin{cases}
4k & \text{if }\exists k \text{ such that } k(k-1) < n \le k^2 \\
4k + 2 & \text{if }\exists k \text{ such that } k^2 < n \le k(k+1)
\end{cases}$$

I'll put a more beautiful formula in a later post, but I have to sleep first. (Sleepy)
 
Here is my solution:

If $T$ is the number of tables and $p$ is the number of people seated, then:

$$p=2\left\lceil\,\frac{\lceil 4\sqrt{T}\rceil}{2}\,\right\rceil$$

To find the minimum number of tables to seat $p$ people, use:

$$T_{\min}=\left\lceil \left(\frac{p}{4} \right)^2-\frac{p}{4}+1 \right\rceil$$

I began with the basis $$p=4\sqrt{T}$$.

I then noticed this needed to be rounded up to the next even number. So I used the ceiling function to round the basis up to the the next greatest integer, then used the ceiling function again to round that result up to the next even integer.

As for the the minimum number of tables needed, I observed that when $T$ is a perfect square, we could subtract 1 less than the square root of $T$ and still seat the same number of people.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
11K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
9K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
10K