Optimizing Silver Plating Costs for a Square Box and Athletics Track

  • Thread starter Thread starter clairez93
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Optimization
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on optimizing the costs of silver plating a closed box with a square base and an athletics track's design. For the box, the optimal dimensions were calculated to minimize the plating cost, resulting in a total cost of $21.82, which was later corrected to $21.60. The second problem involves maximizing the area of an athletics track defined by a perimeter of 400 meters, leading to the dimensions of the straight sections and semi-circular ends being derived. The correct values for the radius and length were identified as x = 63.662 meters and l = 0 meters, respectively.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of calculus, specifically derivatives for optimization.
  • Familiarity with geometric formulas for surface area and volume.
  • Knowledge of LaTeX for mathematical notation.
  • Basic principles of cost optimization in manufacturing.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study optimization techniques in calculus, focusing on cost minimization.
  • Learn about geometric properties of shapes, particularly boxes and circular tracks.
  • Explore advanced LaTeX formatting for clear mathematical presentation.
  • Research cost analysis methods in manufacturing and materials science.
USEFUL FOR

Students in mathematics or engineering fields, particularly those focusing on optimization problems, cost analysis, and geometric calculations.

clairez93
Messages
113
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



1. A closed box of square base and volume 36 cm^3 is to be constructed and silver plated on the outside. Silver plating for the top and the base costs 40 cnets per cm^2 and silver plating for the sides costs 30 cents per cm^2. Calculat ethe cost of plating the box so that the cost is minimized.

2. An athletics track has two "straights" of length l meters and two semi-circular ends of radius x meters. The permieter of the track is 400 m. What values of l and x produce the largest area inside the track? [see attachment #5 for diagram]

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



1. V = l^{2}h = 36

SA = l^{2} + 2lh

h = 36/l^{2}

SA = l^{2} + 72l^{-1}

SA' = 2l - 72l^{-2} = 2l - 72/l^{2} = 0

2l^{3} - 72 = 0

2l^{3} = 72

l = 3.302, w = 3.302, h = 3.302

C = (2lw)(.40) + 2(lh)(.30) + 2(hw)(.30) = $21.82

Edit: Latex makes my final cost not clear, it says $21.82.

Answer Key: $21.60


2. 2\pix + 4x + 2l = 400

\pix^{2} + 2lx = A

2l = 400 - 2\pix - 4x

l = 200 - \pix - 2x

\pix^{2}+(400 - 2\pix - 4x)x = A

-\pix^{2} - 4x^{2} + 400x = A

A' = -2\pix - 8x + 400 = 0

(-2\pi - 8)x = -400

x = 28.005, l = 56.010

Answer Key: x = 63.662, l = 0


I'm not sure what I did wrong.
 

Attachments

  • scan0008.jpg
    scan0008.jpg
    13.9 KB · Views: 798
Physics news on Phys.org
The second one. If the Key Answer is the correct answer. Then I also I solved and achieved that answer.

Try,

Parameter = 400 = 2 \pi r + 2l
Area = \pi r^{2} + 2rl

Note: r = x

and work from there.

My answer was r = \frac{200}{\pi} and l = 0.

I didn't have a calculator. But R seems correct.
 
Last edited:
Question 1 is probably just a rounding error.
 
problem 1

I'm assuming that SA is supposed to represent the total surface area of the box? If so, then shouldn't it be : SA = 2l^{2} + 4lh since the box has a top and bottom and 4 sides?

More importantly, why are you setting the derivative of the surface area equal to zero; wouldn't that minimize/maximize the surface area, not the cost?

You should be minimizing your expression for the cost instead.

problem 2

why is there a 4x in your expression for the perimeter ?

general LaTeX pointers

to get your \pis to show up properly, ou need to put a space between \pi and your next letter: \pi x^2 shows up as \pi x^2 but \pix^2 shows up as \pix^2

to display the \$ sign use \$ instead of $
 
gabbagabbahey said:
problem 1

I'm assuming that SA is supposed to represent the total surface area of the box? If so, then shouldn't it be : SA = 2l^{2} + 4lh since the box has a top and bottom and 4 sides?

More importantly, why are you setting the derivative of the surface area equal to zero; wouldn't that minimize/maximize the surface area, not the cost?

You should be minimizing your expression for the cost instead.

problem 2

why is there a 4x in your expression for the perimeter ?

general LaTeX pointers

to get your \pis to show up properly, ou need to put a space between \pi and your next letter: \pi x^2 shows up as \pi x^2 but \pix^2 shows up as \pix^2

to display the \$ sign use \$ instead of $

Sorry. But yeah \times looks like the cross product.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K