I must say that I have not studied celestial mechanics other than the crumbs I learnt at high school. Now, what discomforts me is the orbital period formula I saw on Wikipedia:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[tex]T=2\pi\sqrt{\frac{a^3}{G(M_1+M_2)}}[/tex]

I do not understand where does this M_{1}+M_{2}can possibly come from. My thinking is as follows: This formula must also be valid for circular orbits, so for simplicity I am considering a as the radius, instead of semi-major axes. Let M_{1}=M be our sun, and M_{2}=m is the orbiting planet. Equating the accelerations found from Newton's law of universal gravitation and from circular motion:

[tex]m\left(\frac{2\pi}{T}\right)^2r=G\frac{Mm}{r^2}[/tex]

Therefore,

[tex]T=2\pi\sqrt{\frac{a^3}{GM}}[/tex]

Where does m come into the picture, doesn't it just cancel? For M>>m, the given formula simplifies into what I found alright, but why, in the general case, it is true? The first thing that came into my mind was that I ignored general relativity by using Newton's law of gravity, but I think the effect of general relativity must be far smaller than the difference M+m makes. Another possibility that occurred to me is that in my derivation I assumed M stationary, which could be wrong since the planet also pulls the sun, but I do not know how to put that into the picture. Is that the reason of that M+m, or am I missing something else?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Orbital period - Where does M1+M2 come from?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**