Orbiting Satellite Energy Conservation

  • Thread starter Thread starter oasis13
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Satellite
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 2K views
oasis13
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have uploaded the question. See attachment "question001"

Homework Equations


L=mvR for circular orbit

The Attempt at a Solution


See attachment "answer001". The problem is that my final answer seems to be imaginary, and I have tried to look for mistakes in my algebra which would lead me to this and haven't found any. Am I wrong in assuming that the Energy before the explosion is the same as the energy after the collision? I assumed that because no work was done on the orbiting mass, the energy was conserved. And there is no torque acting so angular momentum should be conserved.

I would be really grateful if someone could point out where I am going wrong :smile:
 

Attachments

  • question001.jpg
    question001.jpg
    27.5 KB · Views: 454
  • answer001.jpg
    answer001.jpg
    20.1 KB · Views: 510
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The work-energy theorem refers to the change of kinetic energy. The KE of the satellite remains the same if no work was done on it. But what about the potential energy?

ehild