Orbits: explicit r(t) and theta(t)

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter nrqed
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Explicit Orbits
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the equations for r(t) and theta(t) in the context of orbits governed by the inverse square law, specifically treating the central mass as stationary. The key equation presented is r = a(1-e²)/(1+e cos(θ)), where θ represents the true anomaly. While an explicit form for the time evolution of θ does not exist, the mean anomaly M(t) can be expressed as M(t) = M(t₀) + (t-t₀)ṪM, with its relationship to the eccentric anomaly ψ defined by Kepler's equation: M(t) = ψ(t) - e sin(ψ(t)).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of orbital mechanics and gravitational laws
  • Familiarity with Kepler's laws of planetary motion
  • Knowledge of mathematical concepts such as trigonometry and calculus
  • Basic understanding of eccentricity in orbital dynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Kepler's laws and their applications in celestial mechanics
  • Explore the relationship between mean anomaly and eccentric anomaly in detail
  • Learn about the implications of the inverse square law on orbital motion
  • Investigate numerical methods for simulating orbits in gravitational fields
USEFUL FOR

Astronomy students, physicists, and engineers involved in orbital mechanics and satellite design will benefit from this discussion.

nrqed
Science Advisor
Messages
3,762
Reaction score
297
I am sure this is a stupid question but can someone give me the equations for r(t) and theta(t) for an orbit an inverse square law (treating the central mass as being at rest). The books always seem to only give r(theta) i.e. the shape of the orbit but not the actual time evolution. Is it ever done explicitly?

thanks
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
A more proper treatment is treating the center of mass as being at rest. If the orbiting body is of negligible mass, the central mass will essentially be at rest.

You are most likely talking about the equation

[tex]r=\frac{a(1-e^2)}{1+e\cos\theta}[/tex]

where [itex]\theta[/itex] is the true anomaly. The time evolution in terms of [itex]\theta[/itex] does not have an explicit form.

An explicit form for the time evolution of the mean anomaly does exist, and it is quite simple in form:

[tex]M(t)=M(t_0) + (t-t_0)\dot M[/tex]

The mean anomaly is related to the eccentric anomaly [itex]\psi[/itex] via Kepler's equation:

[tex]M(t) = \psi(t) - e\sin\psi(t)[/tex]

The eccentric anomaly is in turn related to the true anomaly by

[tex]\sqrt{1-e}\tan\frac{\theta}2 = \sqrt{1+e}\tan \frac{\psi(t)}2[/tex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 86 ·
3
Replies
86
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K