Order to create a temperature profile.

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mherna48
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Temperature
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a differential equation to create a temperature profile in a rod, focusing on the relationship between temperature, position, and thermal conductivity. Participants explore various mathematical approaches and interpretations of the equation.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a differential equation involving thermal conductivity as a function of temperature and seeks guidance on solving for temperature as a function of position.
  • Another participant clarifies that the constant cross-sectional area can be divided out, leading to a simpler form of the equation.
  • There is a discussion about whether \kappa is a function of temperature or a constant, with implications for how to integrate the equation.
  • Some participants suggest different forms of integration based on the interpretation of \kappa, leading to various expressions for temperature.
  • One participant expresses confusion about the notation and the implications of treating \kappa as a function versus a constant.
  • A later reply acknowledges a mistake in calculation and seeks clarification on how to integrate the right side of the equation.
  • Another participant suggests that the integration approach would depend on the specific form of the function \kappa.
  • One participant considers using numerical methods in Matlab to solve the problem, indicating the complexity of the integration.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of \kappa and how it should be treated in the equation. There is no consensus on the best approach to integrate the equation or the implications of the various interpretations.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the dependence on the specific form of the thermal conductivity function and the challenges in integrating the equation without further information. Unresolved assumptions about the nature of \kappa contribute to the complexity of the problem.

mherna48
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

This is a problem I need to solve in order to create a temperature profile. I have never encountered anything like this, and don't know where to start. Any suggestions?

[tex]A * \frac{\partial}{\partial x}* \left[ \kappa(T(x)) * \frac{\partial T(x)}{\partial x}\right] = 0[/tex]

where
x : Position
A : Cross sectional area of the rod
[tex]T(x)[/tex] : Temperature as a function of position
[tex]\kappa ( T(x) )[/tex] : the coefficient of thermal conductivity as a function of Temperature


I'm trying to solve for [tex]T(x)[/tex].
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Asterisks are multiplications?
 


Yes, not transforms. That would be insane. =)
 
Last edited:


Hello mherna48,

Since A is a constant it is divided away with regards to the right hand side. We are left with a derivative equal to 0, giving thus a constant as solution. This means we have (ordinary derivatives because only x is the independent variable and only x):

[tex]\kappa(T) \cdot \frac{dT}{dx}=\alpha[/tex]

In which [itex]\alpha[/itex] the first integration constant. Can you proceed from here?

coomast
 


coomast said:
Hello mherna48,

Since A is a constant it is divided away with regards to the right hand side. We are left with a derivative equal to 0, giving thus a constant as solution. This means we have (ordinary derivatives because only x is the independent variable and only x):

[tex]\kappa(T) \cdot \frac{dT}{dx}=\alpha[/tex]

In which [itex]\alpha[/itex] the first integration constant. Can you proceed from here?

coomast

Thanks for the help coomast.

I get it to be :

[tex]T(x) = \frac{\alpha}{\kappa(T(x))} \cdot x + C[/tex]

Is that right?

Can I multiply both sides by [tex]\kappa(T(x))[/tex] and square root the right side? Or is that not possible because of the constant?
 


Mmmmm, I get the following:

[tex]\alpha \cdot x + \beta = \int \kappa(T) \cdot dT[/tex]

In which [itex]\alpha[/itex] and [itex]\beta[/itex] are the integration constants. You can further calculate the integral once you know the dependency of the conductivity with temperature.

Does this clearify things?

coomast
 


I am puzzled by this "[itex]\kappa(T(x))[/itex]" What is the reason for the first set of parentheses? Is [itex]\kappa[/itex] a function, so this is [itex]\kappa[/itex] of T(x) or is [itex]\kappa[/itex] simply a constant, so this is [itex]\kappa[/itex] times T (which I would write simply as [itex]\kappa T(x)[/itex]).

In either case, you can't just tread "[itex]\kappa(T(x))[/itex] as a constant as you seem to be trying to do.

If it is [itex]\kappa[/itex] times T(x), then [itex]\kappa T \frac{dT}{dx}= \alpha[/itex] can be written as
[itex]T dT= \frac{\alpha}{\kappa} dx[/itex]
and, integrating,
[itex]\frac{1}{2}T^2= \frac{\alpha}{\kappa}x+ C[/itex]

If [itex]\kappa[/itex] is a function of T, then
[itex]\kappa(T)dT= \alpha dx[/itex]
and, integrating,
[itex]\int \kappa(T)dT= \alpha x+ C[/itex]
essentially what coomast gave.

How you would solve that for T depends heavily on what function [itex]kappa[/itex] is.
 


HallsofIvy said:
I am puzzled by this "[itex]\kappa(T(x))[/itex]" What is the reason for the first set of parentheses? Is [itex]\kappa[/itex] a function, so this is [itex]\kappa[/itex] of T(x) or is [itex]\kappa[/itex] simply a constant, so this is [itex]\kappa[/itex] times T (which I would write simply as [itex]\kappa T(x)[/itex]).

In either case, you can't just tread "[itex]\kappa(T(x))[/itex] as a constant as you seem to be trying to do.

If it is [itex]\kappa[/itex] times T(x), then [itex]\kappa T \frac{dT}{dx}= \alpha[/itex] can be written as
[itex]T dT= \frac{\alpha}{\kappa} dx[/itex]
and, integrating,
[itex]\frac{1}{2}T^2= \frac{\alpha}{\kappa}x+ C[/itex]

If [itex]\kappa[/itex] is a function of T, then
[itex]\kappa(T)dT= \alpha dx[/itex]
and, integrating,
[itex]\int \kappa(T)dT= \alpha x+ C[/itex]
essentially what coomast gave.

How you would solve that for T depends heavily on what function [itex]kappa[/itex] is.

Thanks for the help guys.

[itex]\kappa(T(x))[/itex] is read as Thermal Conductivity as a function of Temperature, and Temperature is a function of position.

And yes, I see where I goofed on my calculation. I made a weird mistake and I don't know what I was thinking there. How would you integrate the right side of the equation, or in your case left side:
[tex]\int \kappa(T(x)) \cdot dT[/tex]

Is that even possible?
 


So what you are saying is that [itex]\kappa(T(x))[/itex] is a function of x. Obviously, how you would integrate that depends on exactly what function that is!
 
  • #10


Hmm. I figured it wouldn't be easy. Maybe I can have Matlab solve it numerically. Thanks for the help everyone.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K