Ordering Carbonyl Group Wavenumbers in NMR

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on ordering the carbonyl group absorptions in NMR spectra, specifically for compounds including cyclohexanone, 3-cyclohexenone, δ-valerolacetone, δ-valerolactam, and 2-cyclohexen-1-one. The carbonyl C=O stretches typically range from 1670 to 1820 cm-1, with cyclohexanone exhibiting a peak at approximately 1710 cm-1. The electronegativity of substituents, such as oxygen and nitrogen, influences the wavenumber, with δ-valerolacetone showing a peak around 1730-1750 cm-1 and δ-valerolactam around 1710-1720 cm-1. Understanding these shifts is crucial for interpreting IR spectra effectively.

PREREQUISITES
  • Knowledge of IR spectroscopy principles
  • Understanding of carbonyl group chemistry
  • Familiarity with IUPAC nomenclature
  • Basic concepts of molecular vibrations and rotations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the effects of electronegative substituents on IR absorption peaks
  • Study the differences between cyclic ketones and amides in IR spectra
  • Learn about the significance of peak shifts in carbonyl compounds
  • Explore advanced IR spectroscopy techniques for structural analysis
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, organic chemists, and researchers analyzing carbonyl compounds in NMR and IR spectroscopy.

Amy B
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


upload_2016-5-3_11-49-6.png

I want to put these in order of increasing wavenumber for the absorptions of the carbonyl group in an nmr spectrum

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I know that the third one is the highest, the NH ketoamine is the lowest and last one is the second lowest but I'm unsure about the first. Which one has higher absorption?
 
Recall that IR works by exciting bonding electrons (for lack of a better term) and this causes an increase in rotational and vibrational energy, as well as bond stretching and bending. Also recall that electronegative atoms tend to shift things downfield, the more electronegative something is, the farther downfield it is shifted. So looking at what you've posted we have (from left to right) cyclohexanone, 3-cyclohexen-1-one, δ-valerolacetone, δ-valerolactam, and 2-cyclohexen-1-one (I'm not 100% on this, but I think we can call 3-cyclohexen-1-one just 3-cyclohexenone since the carbonyl carbon is always the first carbon in these molecules, maybe someone with a stronger knowledge of IUPAC nomenclature can verify this). The links are links to the NIST website with the relevant IR Spectra.

Right away you should see that the cyclic ether and cyclic amide (lactones and lactams respectively) will be shifted further than the usubstituted cyclohexanone. Typically carbonyl C=O stretches occur in the range of 1670 to 1820 or there about. Cyclohexanone has a peak at about 1710. Now valerolacetone has a broad peak about 1730 to about 1750. This is due to the electronegative oxygen atoms. Valerolactam has a forked peak at about 1710 and 1720. As you can see the more electronegative oxygen shifts this peak further than nitrogen does.

These are the kinds of things you should be thinking about when you look at IR stretches, what kinds of substitutions are going on and how they will move that peak away from your unsubstituted molecule (cyclohexanone in this case). Also you should consider the types of motions available to your molecule. If the bond can rotate, vibrate, and stretch/bend then it will be able to dissipate that energy better than a bond that cannot rotate or bend and that will affect how far something is shifted. For instance cyclohexanone shows a peak about 1710, 2-hexanone has a peak around 1720, and hexanal has a peak around 1750.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K