Original Data from Bell's Experiment

  • Thread starter Thread starter owl3951
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Data Experiment
owl3951
Messages
41
Reaction score
1
Should have read the "Loopholes" thread first...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I guess you realize that Bell didn't do the experiments himself. The landmark experiment was done by Alain Aspect and collaborators in 1981.

Here is the paper you should read to start with:

A. Aspect et al., Experimental Tests of Realistic Local Theories via Bell's Theorem, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 460 (1981)

Online at: http://link.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v47/p460


I would be surprised if there is a "raw observations database" available but there is considerable data in the paper references above.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Thread 'Schrödinger equation and classical wave equation'

Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
View full post »

Thread 'Quantum Entanglement is a Kinematic Fact, not a Dynamical Effect'

Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
View full post »

Thread 'Is Maxwell's electromagnetism an effective (field) theory?'

Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
View full post »

Similar threads

A Bell's inequality and experiment
Replies
8
Views
906
A Is the freedom-of-choice loophole valid in quantum entanglement experiments?
Replies
2
Views
2K
I Bell tests: Changing detector settings "just before photon arrives"
Replies
4
Views
1K
A Can entanglement be detected in a single Bell pair?
Replies
1
Views
2K
B Can a Thought Experiment with Dice Challenge Bell Inequalities?
Replies
25
Views
3K
A First loophole-free Bell test?
2
Replies
82
Views
11K
A What is the Bell-like Inequality in Classical Physics?
Replies
6
Views
1K
B Why do photon polarization experiments show similar outcomes in different situations?
Replies
11
Views
2K
I Quantum behavior experiment flawed?
Replies
40
Views
4K
I Do Bell Experiments Show Local Overlap of Wave Functions Before Measurement?
2
Replies
72
Views
5K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top