Origins of the Fundamental Interactions/Forces

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter HeavyWater
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fundamental
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The four fundamental interactions—gravity, weak, color, and electromagnetic forces—are theorized to result from "phase changes" during the universe's expansion from the quark-gluon plasma. While there is strong confidence that the weak and electromagnetic forces were unified prior to the electroweak phase transition, the unification of the strong force with the electroweak force before the Grand Unification phase transition remains less certain. The hypothesis of gravity's unification with the other forces in the early universe lacks experimental validation and remains speculative due to the absence of a robust theory of quantum gravity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Standard Model of particle physics
  • Familiarity with phase transitions in cosmology
  • Knowledge of the electroweak phase transition and its significance
  • Basic concepts of quantum gravity and its challenges
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the electroweak phase transition and its implications in particle physics
  • Explore the Grand Unification Theory and its extensions to the Standard Model
  • Study the role of the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) in confirming particle physics theories
  • Investigate current theories of quantum gravity and their experimental challenges
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, cosmologists, and students of theoretical physics interested in the unification of fundamental forces and the early universe's conditions.

HeavyWater
Messages
55
Reaction score
4
Are the four fundamental interactions (or "forces") e.g. gravity, weak, color, electromagnetic believed to be the result of "phase changes" as the universe expanded from the quark-gluon plasma?
 
Space news on Phys.org
Last edited:
HeavyWater said:
Are the four fundamental interactions (or "forces") e.g. gravity, weak, color, electromagnetic believed to be the result of "phase changes" as the universe expanded from the quark-gluon plasma?

This is basically what is believed, but the degree of confirmation is not the same for all the forces. (Also, if all four forces were in fact unified in the very early universe, then the state at that time would not have been a quark-gluon plasma; quarks and gluons would not have been distinct from any other particles at that time. In fact, this would not have been a good description any time before the Grand Unification phase transition; quarks and gluons only became distinct particles when the strong force and the electroweak force separated--see below.)

We are very confident that the weak and electromagnetic forces were unified before the electroweak phase transition, since we can probe energies at or somewhat above the energy of that phase transition experimentally (the LHC discovery of the Higgs particle was a result of this). The electroweak model is an integral part of the Standard Model of particle physics.

We are fairly confident that the strong (color) force was unified with the electroweak force before the Grand Unification phase transition (I think that's the usual name for it), because, although we can't do experiments at or near the estimated energy scale of that transition, extensions of the Standard Model that include it seem to do pretty well on predictions that we can test. But AFAIK it is not currently known exactly which extension of the Standard Model is the right version of grand unification.

The idea that gravity was unified with the other three forces at some point in the very early universe is, at this point, only a reasonable hypothesis. We can't probe energies anywhere near the scale of the phase transition that would have been involved, and we don't even have a good theory of quantum gravity at this point, so we don't have any way of making predictions based on the hypothesis that we can actually test. Many physicists like the idea because it obviously makes things simpler conceptually, but that's as much as we can say.
 
Thanks Rootone and PeterDonis. Your answers were much better than I expected.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K