Oscillation of a closed subinterval

  • Thread starter Thread starter chaotixmonjuish
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Closed Oscillation
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of oscillation in a closed subinterval, specifically addressing the conditions under which the oscillation of a function \( f \) remains below a specified threshold \( \epsilon \). It is established that if \( \omega_f(x) < \epsilon \) for all \( x \in [a,b] \), then there exists a \( \delta > 0 \) such that for any closed interval \( I \subseteq [a,b] \) with length \( l(I) < \delta \), the oscillation \( \omega_f(I) < \epsilon \). The definitions of oscillation at a point and over an interval are crucial for the proof, emphasizing the need for rigorous mathematical formulation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of oscillation definitions in real analysis
  • Familiarity with closed intervals and their properties
  • Knowledge of supremum and infimum concepts
  • Basic principles of continuity in mathematical functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the formal definitions of oscillation for functions in real analysis
  • Explore the properties of closed intervals and their implications in calculus
  • Learn about the relationship between continuity and oscillation
  • Investigate examples of functions exhibiting uniform oscillation
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those studying real analysis, as well as educators and researchers interested in the properties of oscillating functions and their applications in calculus.

chaotixmonjuish
Messages
284
Reaction score
0
Given \epsilon &gt; 0, suppose \omega_f(x) &lt; \epsilon for each x \in [a,b]. Then show there is \delta &gt; 0 such that for every closed interval I \in [a,b] with l(I)&lt; \delta we have \omega_f(I) &lt; \epsilon.

My first approach to this was trying to think of it as an anaglous to the definition of continuity. However, it would appear, at least to me, that we are talking about a "uniformly" oscillating interval. I'm just not sure how to prove this. My first idea was simply, since I know that things are \epsilon spaced, I could always pick intervals small enough. I'm not sure how to do this rigorously.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The first thing you will need to do is define "\omega_f(x)" and "\omega_f(I)". They are, of course, the "oscillation" of f at x and on interval I, but what are the precise definitions?
 
The definitions of oscillation of a set and point respectively:

\omega_f(A)=\sup\limits_{x,y\in A}f(x)-f(y)|

\omega_f(x)=\inf\{\omega_f(x)=\inf\{\omega_f(x-\epsilon, x+\epsilon)\cap A) : \epsilon &gt; 0\}
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K