Outer Lebesgue Measure Definition

  • Thread starter Thread starter atwood
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Measure
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 2K views
atwood
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I've seen the definition that an outer Lebesgue measure is defined as
[tex]m_n^* (A) = \inf \left\{ \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} l(I_k) \, \left| \, A \subset \bigcup_{k=1}^{\infty} I_k \right}[/tex]
where Ik are n-dimensional intervals and l(Ik) is the geometric length.

It is not actually clear to me if A has to be a proper subset. That is, does
[tex]A \subset \bigcup_{k=1}^{\infty} I_k[/tex]
actually mean
[tex]A \subseteq \bigcup_{k=1}^{\infty} I_k[/tex]
or
[tex]A \subsetneq \bigcup_{k=1}^{\infty} I_k[/tex]
?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why do you think the distinction between those two cases is important? Show that the sum of l(I_k) can be made arbitrarily close to the sum of the lengths of intervals J_k where each I_k is a proper subset of J_k. That's a good exercise.